Rajasthan High Court
CRLMB/2620/2026 of PRIYANSHU S/O RAJESH Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 27 February 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2620/2026 Priyanshu S/o Rajesh, Aged About 19 Years, R/o House Number 19, Adarshpuram Colony, Raipura, Police Station Udyog Nagar, Kota City (Raj.). (At Present Petitioner Confined In Central Jail Kota).
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2620/2026
Priyanshu S/o Rajesh, Aged About 19 Years, R/o House Number 19, Adarshpuram Colony, Raipura, Police Station Udyog Nagar, Kota City (Raj.). (At Present Petitioner Confined In Central Jail Kota).
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
Connected With
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2902/2026
Devendra Kumar S/o Shivdayal, R/o R.N. Tailor Ke Paas, Indira Gandhi Nagar, Police Station Udyog Nagar, Kota. (At Present Petitioner Is Confined In Central Jail Kota).
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3307/2026
Krishankant Urf Vijay S/o Phoolchand, R/o Football Ground Ke Pass, Prince Enclave Kota Road, Police Station Kethun, District Kota, Rajasthan. (At Present Confined In Central Jail, Kota).
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Ashvin Garg with
Mr. Nonit Hatila
Mr. Ashish Bairwa
Mr. Avtar Singh Rathore
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP TANEJA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
(2 of 3) [CRLMB-2620/2026] 27/02/2026
1. The present bail applications have been filed by the accused- petitioners under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No.38/2026 registered at Police Station R.K. Puram, District Kota City, for the offence(s) punishable under Section(s) 140(3) and 309(6) of BNS.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that the accused- petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case and they have nothing to do with the alleged offences. Learned counsel further submit that the accused-petitioners have been arrested for their alleged involvement in the incident, however, no Test Identification Parade has been conducted to ascertain their involvement in the incident. They also submit that the present case is a no injury case, the petitioners are in custody since long and have no criminal antecedents. Learned counsel further submit that the alleged offenses are triable by a Court of Magistrate and trial will take considerably long time in its conclusion, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioners into custody, therefore, they may be enlarged on bail.
3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners hereinabove.
4. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioners, the fact that petitioners have no criminal antecedents, offences are triable by Magistrate and trial will take considerably long time in its conclusion, thus, without commenting anything on the merits / demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioners on bail.
(3 of 3) [CRLMB-2620/2026]
5. Therefore, the instant bail applications are allowed and the accused-petitioners, namely (1) Priyanshu S/O Rajesh (2) Devendra Kumar S/O Shivdayal (3) Krishankant @ Vijay S/O Phoolchand, are ordered to be released on bail, provided, each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the Trial Court, with the stipulation that the petitioners shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (SANDEEP TANEJA),J AVINASH GULERIA /87-89