Rajasthan High Court
CRLMB/2899/2026 of RADHE @ RADHEYSHYAM S/O SUBE Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 26 February 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2899/2026 Radhe @ Radheyshyam S/o Sube, R/o Sone Ka Gurja, Police Station Sone Ka Gurja, District Dholpur. (At Present Confined In District Jail, Dholpur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through
[2026:RJ-JP:9011]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2899/2026
Radhe @ Radheyshyam S/o Sube, R/o Sone Ka Gurja, Police Station Sone Ka Gurja, District Dholpur. (At Present Confined In District Jail, Dholpur).
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Anil Jain
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Jeetendra Singh Rathore, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP TANEJA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
26/02/2026
1. The present second bail application has been filed by the accused- petitioner under Section 483 BNSS in connection with FIR No.72/2025 registered at Police Station Sone Ka Gurja, District Dholpur for the offence(s) punishable under Section(s) 3(1), 25(1AB) of Arms Act.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and he has nothing to do with the alleged offences. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner is in custody since 27.11.2025 and no recovery is required to be made from the petitioner. He also submits that the alleged offence(s) are triable by the Magistrate; charge-sheet has already been filed in the matter and conclusion of trial will take considerably long time, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner into custody, and therefore prays to enlarge the petitioner on bail.
3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the bail application and submits that petitioner has criminal antecedent since as many as nine cases are pending against him.
[2026:RJ-JP:9011] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-2899/2026]
4. In response thereto, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that out of the said cases, petitioner has been acquitted in five cases.
5. Taking into consideration the overall facts & circumstances of the case; the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, the fact that the case is triable by Magistrate, charge-sheet has already been filed in the matter and trial will take considerably long time in its conclusion, without commenting anything upon the merits / demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.
6. Therefore, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and the accused-petitioner Radhe @ Radheyshyam S/o Sube is ordered to be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of The trial Court, with the following conditions:-
(i) The accused-petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or influence the witness in any manner.
(ii) The accused-petitioner shall not indulge in any criminal activity and shall not repeat any criminal offence punishable under the Law.
(iii) The accused-petitioner shall attend the hearing of the trial Court on the date fixed by the trial Court or as and when asked to appear before the trial Court.
(iv) In case of any violation of above conditions, the bail granted to the accused-petitioner shall be liable to be cancelled. (SANDEEP TANEJA),J TN/64