Rajasthan High Court
CRLMB/2742/2026 of SANDEEP SINGH S/O SHRI PRATAP SINGH Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 26 February 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2742/2026 Sandeep Singh S/o Shri Pratap Singh, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Ucheriya, Police Station Makrana, District Deedwana-Kuchaman, Rajasthan. (At Present Accused In Jail At Sikar). ----Petitioner Versus
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2742/2026
Sandeep Singh S/o Shri Pratap Singh, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Ucheriya, Police Station Makrana, District Deedwana-Kuchaman, Rajasthan. (At Present Accused In Jail At Sikar).
----Petitioner
Versus
State of Rajasthan, through PP
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Shishram Saini
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Jitendra Singh Rathore, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP TANEJA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
26/02/2026
1. This bail application has been filed on behalf of the accused- petitioner under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. in connection with FIR No. 76/2025 registered at Police Station Danta Ramgarh, District Sikar for the offence(s) punishable under Section(s) 19, 54, 54(A) of Rajasthan Excise Act, 1950.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and he has nothing to do with the alleged offences. Learned counsel further submits that co-accused namely, Daleep Singh has already been enlarged on bail by a Coordinate Bench of this Court, vide order dated 30.01.2026, in S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 1724/2026. He also submits that the petitioner is in custody since 04.01.2026 and no recovery is required to be made from him. He further submits that the alleged offence(s) are triable by a Court of
(2 of 2) [CRLMB-2742/2026] Magistrate and investigation / trial of the case will take considerably long time in its conclusion, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in custody and therefore, prays that the petitioner may be enlarged on bail.
3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner hereinabove.
4. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, the fact that co-accused has already been enlarged on bail by a Coordinate Bench of this Court, offence is triable by Magistrate and investigation / trial will take considerably long time in its conclusion, without commenting anything on merits / demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.
5. Therefore, this bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and the accused-petitioner Sandeep Singh S/o Shri Pratap Singh is ordered to be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the Trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (SANDEEP TANEJA),J SKS/61