Rajasthan High Court
CRLMB/1427/2026 of SACHIN KUMAR S/O SHRI ROHITASH Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 26 February 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1427/2026 Sachin Kumar S/o Shri Rohitash, R/o Mahradas, Police Station Malsisar, District Jhunjhunu. (At Present Petitioner is Confined in District Jail Jhunjhunu). ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan
[2026:RJ-JP:8911]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1427/2026
Sachin Kumar S/o Shri Rohitash, R/o Mahradas, Police Station Malsisar, District Jhunjhunu.
(At Present Petitioner is Confined in District Jail Jhunjhunu).
----Petitioner
Versus
State of Rajasthan through PP
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Anil Mahala
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP
Mr. Hanuman Choudhary
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP TANEJA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
26/02/2026
1. This bail application has been filed by the accused-petitioner under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No.03/2026 registered at Police Station Malsisar, District Jhunjhunu for offence(s) punishable under Section(s) 189(2), 329(3), 351(2), 352, 324(4), 115(2) & 109(1) of BNS.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused- petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and he has nothing to do with the alleged offences. Learned counsel further submits that it is a case of cross FIR and injuries sustained by the injured person are simple in nature. Learned counsel also submits that petitioner has no criminal antecedent, he is in custody since 03.01.2026, no recovery is required to be made from him; investigation and trial will take considerably long time in its conclusion, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the
[2026:RJ-JP:8911] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-1427/2026] petitioner in custody, therefore, prays to enlarge the petitioner on bail.
3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor and learned counsel for the complainant vehemently oppose the bail application.
4. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for both the parties; the fact that it is a case of cross FIR, injuries sustained by the injured person are simple in nature, there is no criminal antecedent against the petitioner, investigation and trial will take considerably long time in its conclusion, without commenting anything upon the merits / demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.
5. Therefore, this bail application is allowed and accused- petitioner Sachin Kumar S/o Shri Rohitash is ordered to be released on bail, provided, he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the Trial Court, with the stipulation that the petitioner shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (SANDEEP TANEJA),J TN/35