Rajasthan High Court
CRLMB/16815/2025 of MONU S/O SANTOSH Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 26 February 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 16815/2025 Monu S/o Santosh, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Dhobi Pada, Basedi, Police Station Basedi, District Dholpur. (At Present confined in District Jail Dholpur). ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan,
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 16815/2025
Monu S/o Santosh, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Dhobi Pada, Basedi, Police Station Basedi, District Dholpur.
(At Present confined in District Jail Dholpur).
----Petitioner
Versus
State of Rajasthan, Through PP
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Sachin Kumar
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP TANEJA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
26/02/2026
1. This bail application has been filed on behalf of the accused- petitioner under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. in connection with FIR No. 445/2025 registered at Police Station Sadar Dholpur, District Dholpur for the offence(s) punishable under Section(s) 3, 25(1)(a) of Arms Act.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and he has nothing to do with the alleged offences. Learned counsel further submits that the alleged offences are triable by Magistrate; the petitioner is in custody since 27.11.2025 and no recovery is required to be made from him. He also submits that charge-sheet has already been filed in the matter and trial of the case will take considerably long time in its conclusion, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in custody, and therefore, prays that the petitioner may be enlarged on bail.
3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner hereinabove and submits that the petitioner is having nine criminal antecedents.
(2 of 2) [CRLMB-16815/2025]
4. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, the fact that the offences are triable by Magistrate, charge-sheet has already been filed in the matter and trial will take considerably long time in its conclusion, without commenting anything on merits / demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.
5. Therefore, this bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and the accused-petitioner, namely Monu S/o Santosh is ordered to be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the Trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
6. It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not indulge in any other offence(s) during currency of the bail.
7. The accused-petitioner is directed to mark his presence before the concerned Police Station on the 26th day of every month till conclusion of trial and the SHO of the concerned Police Station shall forward petitioner’s attendance report to the Trial Court on the same day of each month.
8. In case of breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be at liberty to move an application against the petitioner for cancellation of bail before the concerned Court.
9. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned SHO for necessary compliance. (SANDEEP TANEJA),J SKS/16