Rajasthan High Court
CRLMB/2556/2026 of TUSHAR SINGH PANWAR S/O MAHENDRA SINGH Vs THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 26 February 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2556/2026 Tushar Singh Panwar S/o Mahendra Singh, Aged About 18 Years, R/o 3-L-32 Vigyan Nagar Kota City. At Present Residing At Solanki House Mokhapada, Police Station Kethunipol, Kota City (Raj.) (At
[2026:RJ-JP:8969]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2556/2026
Tushar Singh Panwar S/o Mahendra Singh, Aged About 18 Years, R/o 3-L-32 Vigyan Nagar Kota City. At Present Residing At Solanki House Mokhapada, Police Station Kethunipol, Kota City (Raj.) (At Present Confined In Central Jail, Kota).
----Petitioner
Versus
The State Of Rajasthan, Through PP
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Avtar Singh Rathore
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP TANEJA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
26/02/2026
1. This bail application has been filed by the accused-petitioner under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. in connection with F.I.R. No.101/2025 registered at Police Station Kaithunipol, District Kota City, for the offence(s) punishable under Section(s) 126(2), 115(2), 109(1), 3(5) & 118(1) B.N.S. and Section 4/25 of the Arms Act.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused- petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and he has nothing to do with the alleged offences. Learned counsel further submits that the injuries sustained by the injured persons are simple in nature. Learned counsel also contends that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent; he is in custody since 05.12.2025; no recovery is required to be made from him. He further submits that after investigation, charge-sheet has been filed in the matter and trial will take considerably long time in its conclusion, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in custody, therefore, the benefit of bail under Section 483 B.N.S.S. may be granted to the accused-petitioner.
[2026:RJ-JP:8969] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-2556/2026]
3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner hereinabove.
4. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for for the petitioner, the fact that the injuries sustained by injured persons are simple in nature; there is no criminal antecedent against the petitioner; charge-sheet has already been filed and trial will take long time in its conclusion, thus, without commenting anything on the merits / demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.
5. Therefore, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and the accused-petitioner, namely Tushar Singh Panwar S/o Mahendra Singh, is ordered to be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the Trial Court, with the stipulation that the petitioner shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when he is called upon to do so. (SANDEEP TANEJA),J SAHIL SONI /55