Rajasthan High Court
CRLMB/85/2026 of KARAN SINGH S/O HANUMAN SINGH @ BHAGWAN SINGH Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 25 February 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 85/2026 Karan Singh S/o Hanuman Singh @ Bhagwan Singh, aged about 48 Years, R/o Tasing, Police Station Behror, District Behror Kotputali (Rajasthan) (At Present Confined In District Jail, Bharatpur).
[2026:RJ-JP:8701]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 85/2026
Karan Singh S/o Hanuman Singh @ Bhagwan Singh, aged about 48 Years, R/o Tasing, Police Station Behror, District Behror Kotputali (Rajasthan)
(At Present Confined In District Jail, Bharatpur).
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, through PP
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Girish Khandelwal
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Jeetendra Singh Rathore, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP TANEJA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
25/02/2026
1. This bail application has been filed by the accused-petitioner under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. in connection with FIR No.583/2015 registered at Police Station Kotwali Bharatpur, District Bharatpur for offence(s) under Section(s) 420, 406 and 120-B of IPC.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused- petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and he has nothing to do with the alleged offences. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner was merely employed on a salaried basis at Sarv Kalyan Seva Sansthan and the said Sansthan belongs to one Mr. Randhir Singh, who has already been acquitted by the learned Trial Court after conclusion of trial.
3. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner is in custody since 20.10.2025 and no recovery is required to be made from him. He also submits that the alleged offences are triable by the Magistrate;
[2026:RJ-JP:8701] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-85/2026] charge-sheet has already been filed in the matter and conclusion of trial will take considerably long time, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in custody, therefore, he prays to enlarge the petitioner on bail.
4. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the bail application and submits that 16 other FIRs are pending against the petitioner.
5. In response to the fact of 16 pending FIRs, learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that all these FIRs were registered against him at the same police station pertaining to similar incidents filed by various persons one after the other and in one of those cases, the petitioner has already been granted bail by the trial Court in Bail Application No.40/2026.
6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, the fact that the offences are triable by the Magistrate, charge-sheet has already been filed in the matter and trial will take considerable long time in its conclusion, thus, without commenting anything upon the merits / demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.
7. Therefore, this bail application is allowed and accused-petitioner Karan Singh S/o Hanuman Singh @ Bhagwan Singh is ordered to be released on bail, provided, he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.5,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.2,50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that the petitioner shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (SANDEEP TANEJA),J TN/24