Rajasthan High Court
CRLMB/2152/2026 of GHANSHYAM S/O BHAGIRATH/ MOHAN Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 25 February 2026
[CRLMB-2152/2026] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2152/2026 Ghanshyam S/o Bhagirath/ Mohan, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Kalbeliya Basti, Jail Colony, Atru Police Station Atru, District Baran (Raj.) (Presently Confined In
(1 of 2)
[CRLMB-2152/2026]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2152/2026
Ghanshyam S/o Bhagirath/ Mohan, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Kalbeliya Basti, Jail Colony, Atru Police Station Atru, District Baran (Raj.) (Presently Confined In District Jail, Baran)
----Petitioner
Versus
State of Rajasthan, Through PP
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Buddhi Prakash Meena
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Jitendra Singh Rathore, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP TANEJA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
25/02/2026
1. This bail application has been filed on behalf of the accused- petitioner under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. in connection with FIR No. 10/2024 registered at Police Station Nahargarh (Baran), District Baran for the offence(s) under Section(s) 419, 420, 406, 467, 468 and 471 of IPC.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and he has nothing to do with the alleged offences. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner is in custody since 19.12.2025 and he has no criminal antecedent. Learned counsel also submits that after investigation, charge-sheet has been filed in the matter, the offences are triable by Magistrate and trial of the case will take considerable time in its conclusion, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody,
(2 of 2) [CRLMB-2152/2026] and therefore, prays that the petitioner may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS.
3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner hereinabove.
4. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, the fact that the offence is triable by Magistrate; charge- sheet has already been filed in the matter; trial will take considerably long time in its conclusion; the petitioner has no criminal antecedent; thus, without commenting anything on merits / demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.
5. Therefore, this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS is allowed and accused-petitioner Ghanshyam S/o Bhagirath/ Mohan is ordered to be released on bail, provided, he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the Trial Court, with the stipulation that the petitioner shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when he is called upon to do so. (SANDEEP TANEJA),J SKS/32