Rajasthan High Court
CRLMB/17040/2025 of JITENDRA BURDAK @ JEETU S/O LATE BHEEWA RAM BURDAK Vs THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 25 February 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 17040/2025 Jitendra Burdak @ Jeetu S/o Late Bheewa Ram Burdak, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Vill. Basdi Kalan, Police Station Jeenmata, District Sikar (Raj.) (At Present In Sub Jail Neemkathana). ----Petitioner
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 17040/2025
Jitendra Burdak @ Jeetu S/o Late Bheewa Ram Burdak, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Vill. Basdi Kalan, Police Station Jeenmata, District Sikar (Raj.) (At Present In Sub Jail Neemkathana).
----Petitioner
Versus
The State of Rajasthan, Through PP
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Babu Lal Nasuna with
Mr. Bholu Ram and
Mr. Prem Prakash
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP TANEJA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
25/02/2026
1. The present bail application has been filed by the accused- petitioner under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. in connection with F.I.R. No.99/2025 registered at Police Station Jajod, District Sikar for the offence(s) punishable under Section(s) 308(2), 324(4), 115(2), 126(2), 351(2), 111(4) and 3(5) of B.N.S.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and he has nothing to do with the alleged offences. Learned counsel further submits that two co-accused, namely Mahendra Gora S/o Ramlal and Deshraj Jitarwal S/o Nathuram, have already been enlarged on bail by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court, vide order dated 25.11.2025, in S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.14833/2025. Learned counsel also submits that the petitioner is in custody since 27.10.2025, no recovery is required to be made from him; charge-sheet has already been filed in the matter and conclusion
(2 of 3) [CRLMB-17040/2025] of trial will take considerably long time, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner into custody, and therefore prays to enlarge the petitioner on bail.
3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner and submits that there are 10 other criminal cases pending against the petitioner.
4. Taking into consideration the overall facts & circumstances of the case; the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, the fact that two accused persons, named above, have already been enlarged on bail by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court; the charge-sheet has already been filed in the matter and trial will take considerably long time in its conclusion, thus, without commenting anything upon the merits / demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.
5. Therefore, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and the accused-petitioner, namely Jitendra Burdak @ Jeetu S/o Late Bheewa Ram Burdak, is ordered to be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the Trial Court, with the following conditions:-
(i) The accused-petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or influence the witness in any manner.
(ii) The accused-petitioner shall not indulge in any criminal activity and shall not repeat any criminal offence punishable under the Law.
(3 of 3) [CRLMB-17040/2025]
(iii) The accused-petitioner shall attend the hearing of the Trial Court on the date fixed by the Trial Court or as and when asked to appear before the trial Court.
6. The accused-petitioner is directed to mark his presence before the concerned Police Station on the 12th date of every month till conclusion of trial. The SHO of the concerned Police Station shall forward petitioner’s attendance report to the trial Court on the same day of each month.
7. In case of breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be at liberty to move an application against the petitioner for cancellation of bail before the concerned Court.
8. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned SHO for necessary compliance. (SANDEEP TANEJA),J AVINASH GULERIA /22