Rajasthan High Court
CRLMB/3111/2026 of SHRIKESH S/O RAMVARAN Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 25 February 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3111/2026 Shrikesh S/o Ramvaran, R/o Nagla Ambar Khan, Police Station Kanchanpur, District Dholpur. (At Present Confined In District Jail, Dholpur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
[2026:RJ-JP:8802]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3111/2026
Shrikesh S/o Ramvaran, R/o Nagla Ambar Khan, Police Station Kanchanpur, District Dholpur. (At Present Confined In District Jail, Dholpur).
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Udit Sapra
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP TANEJA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
25/02/2026
1. The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the accused-petitioner under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. in connection with F.I.R. No.102/2019 registered at Police Station Dihauli, District Dholpur for offence(s) punishable under Section(s) 457 and 380 IPC later on converted under Section(s) 458, 395 IPC.
2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that present matter pertains to bail jump as the petitioner was initially enlarged on bail by the learned Trial Court. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner, being a labourer went out of State to earn his livelihood and for the aforesaid reason, he failed to appear before the learned Trial Court on 24.10.2024, resulting into forfeiture of his bail bonds and issuance of non-bailable arrest warrant against him, by the learned Trial Court. Learned counsel also submits that petitioner has been arrested on 06.02.2026 and he is in custody since then.
[2026:RJ-JP:8802] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-3111/2026]
3. Learned counsel further contends that it is the first time that the petitioner has jumped his bail. Learned counsel also submits that the petitioner shall not impede the course of trial. Counsel also undertakes that the petitioner shall appear before the concerned court on each and every date. He further submits that the petitioner shall not make any further attempt to jump the bail again, therefore, in the interest of justice, the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed.
4. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the accused- petitioner hereinabove.
5. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case; the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, without expressing any opinion on merits / demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.
6. Therefore, the bail application under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. is allowed and accused-petitioner Shrikesh S/o Ramvaran is ordered to be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 25,000/- each, out of whom one surety should be a close relative of the petitioner, to the satisfaction of the trial Court for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so. (SANDEEP TANEJA),J TN/58