Rajasthan High Court
CRLMB/2692/2026 of JILSAD S/O SAMSU Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 16 February 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Second Bail Application No. 2692/2026 1. Jilsad S/o Samsu, Aged About 18 Years, R/o Amarsingh Ka Bas, Police Station Sikri, District Deeg. (Present Confined At District Jail Deeg). ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan,
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Second Bail Application No.
1.
Jilsad S/o Samsu, Aged About 18 Years, R/o Amarsingh Ka Bas, Police Station Sikri, District Deeg. (Present Confined At District Jail Deeg).
----Petitioners
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through PP
----Respondents
Connected With
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Second Bail Application No.
Ahsan S/o Sahun, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Thekdi, Police Station Sikari, District Deeg, Rajasthan. (At Present Confined In Sub Jail, Deeg).
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Jaipur, Through PP
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Ram Babu Sharma
Mr. Ravindra Kumar
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Amit Kumar Gupta, Addl.G.A. cum
P.P.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
16/02/2026
1. These second bail applications have been filed by the accused-petitioners under Section 483 of the B.N.S.S. in connection with FIR No.399/2025 registered at Police Station Sikri, District Deeg for offences under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 317(2), 317(4), 317(5), 303(2), 313 and 61(2) of
(2 of 3) [CRLMB-2755/2026] B.N.S., 2023 and Section 66D of Information Technology Act, 2008.
2. The learned counsels for the accused-petitioners submit that the accused-petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case and they are in custody since 11.11.2025. Learned counsels further submit that Police after completion of investigation, has submitted charge-sheet in the matter and the accused-petitioners are no more required for any kind of interrogation or recovery. The learned counsels further submit that no other criminal case is pending against the petitioners, therefore, they may be released on bail.
3. Learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State opposed these second bail applications.
4. Considered the submissions made by the learned counsels for the accused-petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor.
5. Having regard to the submissions made by learned counsels for the accused-petitioners so also the fact that Police after completion of investigation has submitted charge-sheet in the matter and also the fact that no other criminal case is pending against the accused-petitioners, this Court without expressing any opinion on merits and demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioners on bail.
6. Accordingly, these second bail applications are allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioners shall be released on bail provided each of them shall furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac Only), together with two sureties in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) each to
(3 of 3) [CRLMB-2755/2026] the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court or any other Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
7. Registry is directed to place a copy of this order in connected file. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J ARTI SHARMA /1-2