Rajasthan High Court
CRLMB/2368/2026 of CHANDRAPRAKASH @ CHANDRA S/O DAYARAM Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 16 February 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2368/2026 1. Chandraprakash @ Chandra S/o Dayaram, R/o Guamanpura, Police Station Itawa, District Kota Rural, Rajasthan. (At Present Central Jail, Kota). 2. Surendra @ Bittu S/o Dayaram, R/o Guamanpura,
[2026:RJ-JP:7350]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2368/2026
1.
Chandraprakash @ Chandra S/o Dayaram, R/o Guamanpura, Police Station Itawa, District Kota Rural, Rajasthan. (At Present Central Jail, Kota).
2.
Surendra @ Bittu S/o Dayaram, R/o Guamanpura, Police Station Itawa, District Kota Rural, Rajasthan. (At Present Central Jail, Kota).
----Petitioners
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through PP
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Abhimanyu Singh Yaduvanshi
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Jitendra Singh Rathore, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP TANEJA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
16/02/2026
1. The present bail application has been filed by the accused- petitioners under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. in connection with F.I.R. No.428/2025 registered at Police Station Itawa, District Kota Rural, for the offence(s) punishable under Section(s) 115(2), 126(2), 117(2), 110 & 3(5) of B.N.S.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the accused- petitioners have been falsely implicated in the case and they have nothing to do with the alleged offences. Learned counsel further contends that the accused-petitioners and the complainant are of the same family and the dispute arose over water irrigation in the field. Learned counsel also submits that the injuries sustained by the injured person are not dangerous to life; the petitioners are in custody since long and there is no criminal antecedent against them. Learned counsel further submits that charge-sheet has been filed in the matter; no further recovery is required to be
[2026:RJ-JP:7350] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-2368/2026] made from the petitioners and trial will considerably take long time in its conclusion, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioners in custody, therefore, the benefit of bail under Section 483 B.N.S.S. may be granted to the accused- petitioners.
3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners hereinabove.
4. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioners, the fact that charge-sheet has already been filed; none of the injuries sustained by injured is dangerous to life; no criminal antecedent exists against the petitioners and trial will take considerably long time to conclude, thus, without commenting anything on the merits / demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioners on bail.
5. Therefore, the present bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and the accused-petitioners, namely Chandraprakash @ Chandra S/o Dayaram and Surendra @ Bittu S/o Dayaram, are ordered to be released on bail, provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the Trial Court, with the stipulation that the petitioners shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when they are called upon to do so. (SANDEEP TANEJA),J SAHIL SONI /62