Rajasthan High Court
CRLMB/2606/2026 of LUVKUSH S/O SONERAM Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 13 February 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2606/2026 Luvkush S/o Soneram, R/o Bhairo Ka Pura Mauroli, Police Station Kotwali, District Dholpur, (Raj). (At Present Confined In District Jail, Dholpur). ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, Through
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2606/2026
Luvkush S/o Soneram, R/o Bhairo Ka Pura Mauroli, Police Station Kotwali, District Dholpur, (Raj). (At Present Confined In District Jail, Dholpur).
----Petitioner
Versus
State of Rajasthan, Through PP
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Anil Jain
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP TANEJA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
13/02/2026
1. This bail application has been filed on behalf of the petitioner under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. in connection with FIR No. 206/2024 registered at Police Station Kotwali, District Dholpur for offences under Sections 399, 402 IPC and Section 3, 25(6) of Arms Act.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that present matter pertains to bail jump. The petitioner, being a labourer went out of State to earn his livelihood and for the aforesaid reason he could not appear on 06.06.2025, resulting into forfeiture of his bail bonds by the Trial Court.
3. Learned counsel submits that the petitioner himself surrendered before the Trial Court on 05.02.2026 and since then he is in custody. Learned counsel further submits that the
(2 of 2) [CRLMB-2606/2026] petitioner shall not impede the course of trial and also the petitioner is ready to abide by the conditions imposed by this Court. It is assured that the petitioner shall not make an attempt to jump the bail again. This is first time that he jumped bail, therefore, in the interest of justice, the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed.
4. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the bail application.
5. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case; the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits / demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.
6. Therefore, this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS is allowed and accused-petitioner Luvkush S/o Soneram is ordered to be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each, out of whom one surety should be a close relative of the petitioner, to the satisfaction of the trial Court for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so. (SANDEEP TANEJA),J SKS/68