Rajasthan High Court
CRLMB/1640/2026 of HARPREET SINGH @ HAPPY S/O KARNAIL SINGH Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 13 February 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1640/2026 Harpreet Singh @ Happy S/o Karnail Singh, aged about 37 Years, R/o Bakhopaur Road Awanogarh, Police Station Bhawanigarah, District Sangrur, Punjab Presently Lodged In Central Jail Kota.
[2026:RJ-JP:7018]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1640/2026
Harpreet Singh @ Happy S/o Karnail Singh, aged about 37
Years, R/o Bakhopaur Road Awanogarh, Police Station Bhawanigarah, District Sangrur, Punjab Presently Lodged In Central Jail Kota.
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Achintya Kaushik with
Ms. Bharti Sharma
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP TANEJA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
13/02/2026
1. This bail application has been filed by the accused-petitioner under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. in connection with FIR No.66/2024 registered at Police Station Gumanpura, District Kota City for offence(s) under Section(s) 420, 406 and 407 of IPC.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused- petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and he has no nexus with the alleged offences. Learned counsel further submits that the alleged offences are triable by the Magistrate; the petitioner is in custody since 14.02.2025, charge-sheet has already been filed in the matter and no recovery is required to be made from the petitioner. He also submits that conclusion of trial will take considerably long time, so no fruitful purpose would be
[2026:RJ-JP:7018] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-1640/2026] served by keeping the petitioner in custody, therefore, prays to enlarge the petitioner on bail.
3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor opposes the bail application and submits that petitioner has one criminal antecedent, in which he has already been convicted.
4. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, the fact that the offences are triable by the Magistrate, chargesheet has already been filed in the matter and trial will take considerably long time in its conclusion, thus, without commenting anything upon the merits / demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.
5. Therefore, this bail application is allowed and accused- petitioner Harpreet Singh @ Happy S/o Karnail Singh is ordered to be released on bail, provided, he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that the petitioner shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (SANDEEP TANEJA),J TN/40