Rajasthan High Court
CRLMB/351/2026 of TANUJ SINGH S/O MANVEER SINGH Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 12 February 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 351/2026 Tanuj Singh S/o Manveer Singh, Aged About 38 Years, R/o House No. F-5, Dada Badi Vistar Yojana, Kota Rajasthan ( At Present Confined In District Jail Kota) ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan,
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 351/2026
Tanuj Singh S/o Manveer Singh, Aged About 38 Years, R/o House No. F-5, Dada Badi Vistar Yojana, Kota Rajasthan ( At Present Confined In District Jail Kota)
----Petitioner
Versus
State of Rajasthan, Through P.P.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Paras Jain
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Vivek Sharma,P.P.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP TANEJA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
12/02/2026
1. This bail application has been filed by the accused-petitioner under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. in connection with FIR No. 175/2022 registered at Police Station Jawahar Nagar, Kota City, District Kota for offence under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B IPC.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner, who is an innocent person, has been falsely implicated in this case and he has no nexus with the alleged offence. Learned Counsel further submits that the parties are having a civil dispute for which a Civil Suit No. 460/2017 is already pending before the learned Civil Judge (South), Kota and the present FIR has been lodged only as a counterblast to the filing of the said suit. Learned counsel also submits that the alleged offences are triable by Magistrate; the petitioner is in custody since long and the charge-
(2 of 2) [CRLMB-351/2026] sheet has already been filed in the matter. Learned Counsel further submits that no recovery is required to be made from the petitioner and the trial will take considerably long time in its conclusion, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping him in custody, and therefore, prays that the petitioner may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of B.N.S.S.
3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner hereinabove.
4. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case; the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, the facts that charge-sheet has been filed; the alleged offences are triable by Magistrate and trial of the case will take considerably long time in its conclusion, thus, without commenting anything on merits / demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.
6. Therefore, this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS is allowed and accused-petitioner Tanuj Singh S/o Manveer Singh is ordered to be released on bail, provided, he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that the petitioner shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when he is called upon to do so. (SANDEEP TANEJA),J SKS/16