Rajasthan High Court
CRLMB/1550/2026 of SHAHANWAJ S/O AYUB Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 12 February 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1550/2026 Shahanwaj S/o Ayub, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Bhuru Ka Vas, Police Station Sikari, District Deeg. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Deeg). ----Petitioner Versus State of
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1550/2026
Shahanwaj S/o Ayub, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Bhuru Ka Vas, Police Station Sikari, District Deeg. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Deeg).
----Petitioner
Versus
State of Rajasthan, Through PP
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Ankit Khandelwal
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP TANEJA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
12/02/2026
1. This bail application has been filed by the accused-petitioner under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. in connection with FIR No. 380/2025 registered at Police Station Sikari, District Deeg for offences under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 317(2), 317(4), 317(5), 303(2), 313, 61(2) of B.N.S. and Section 66-D of Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner, who is an innocent person, has been falsely implicated in this case and he has no nexus with the alleged offences. Learned counsel further submits that co-accused namely Bilal, Ashraf, Hasab and Aakip @ Aakib have already been enlarged on bail by a coordinate bench of this court, vide common order dated 26.11.2025 in S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 15095/2025, S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 15531/2025
(2 of 3) [CRLMB-1550/2026] and S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 15532/2025 and the case of present petitioner also stands on the same footing. Learned counsel also submits that no complaint has been registered against the petitioner on the helpline No. 1930 of National Cyber Crime Reporting Portal (NCRP).
3. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent; he is in custody since long and no recovery is required to be made from the petitioner. He also submits that the trial of the case will take considerably long time in its conclusion and the petitioner is ready to cooperate with the investigation / trial, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping him in custody, therefore, prays that the petitioner may be granted the benefit of bail on the ground of parity.
4. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner hereinabove.
5. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case; the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner; the facts that co-accused namely Bilal, Ashraf, Hasab and Aakip @ Aakib have already been released on bail by a coordinate bench of this court and trial of the case will take considerably long time in its conclusion; thus, without commenting anything on merits / demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.
6. Therefore, this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS is allowed and accused-petitioner Shahanwaj S/o Ayub is ordered
(3 of 3) [CRLMB-1550/2026] to be released on bail, provided, he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that the petitioner shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when he is called upon to do so.
7. The petitioner is directed to mark his presence before the concerned police station on 20th day of every month till conclusion of trial and the SHO of the concerned police station shall forward the petitioner’s attendance report to the trial court on the same day of each month. In case of any breach of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be at liberty to move an application against the petitioner for cancellation of bail before the concerned Court.
8. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned SHO for necessary compliance. (SANDEEP TANEJA),J SKS/47