Rajasthan High Court

SAW/864/2026 of VINAY KUMARI Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 10 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 864/2026 CNR: RJHC010737932026 | URN: SAW / 1711U / 2026 Vinay Kumari W/o Rakesh Kumar, Aged About 55 Years, Resident of Village Banda Colony, Anoopgarh, District Sriganganagar (Raj.) ----Appellant Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan,

[2026:RJ-JP:37926-DB]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

AT JODHPUR

D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 864/2026

CNR: RJHC010737932026 | URN: SAW / 1711U / 2026

Vinay Kumari W/o Rakesh Kumar, Aged About 55 Years, Resident of Village Banda Colony, Anoopgarh, District Sriganganagar (Raj.)

----Appellant

Versus

1.

State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Department Of Education Group-II, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Rajasthan, Jaipur.

2.

The Director Secondary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner.

3.

The Deputy Director, School Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner.

4.

District Education Officer, Sriganganagar

5.

Principal, Government Senior Secondary School, Bandagaon, Anoopgarh.

6.

Principal, Government Senior Secondary School, Satsera Khurd, Banswara.

----Respondents

For Appellant(s)

:

Mr. Ram Chandra Bishnoi.

For Respondent(s)

:

Mr. Sajjan Singh Rathore, AAG.

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

Order

10/08/2026

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that during pendency of the present appeal, the order impugned dated 20.05.2026 has been given effect to by the respondents by deciding the representation of the petitioner, therefore, he seeks

[2026:RJ-JP:37926-DB] (2 of 2) [SAW-864/2026] permission to withdraw the present appeal with liberty to challenge the order passed by the State Government on the petitioner’s representation.

3. Permission sought for is granted.

4. The present appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid. (BHUWAN GOYAL),J (VINIT KUMAR MATHUR),J 27-Shahenshah/-

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead