Rajasthan High Court
HC/418/2026 of SAHIL KUMAR Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 10 August 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR D.B. Habeas Corpus Petition No. 418/2026 CNR: RJHC010653912026 | URN: HC / 658U / 2026 Sahil Kumar S/o Bhagwan Das, Aged About 22 Years, Meghwalo Ka Bass Narwana Kerwada Ahore District Jalore ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary Home
[2026:RJ-JP:37955-DB]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
AT JODHPUR
D.B. Habeas Corpus Petition No. 418/2026
CNR: RJHC010653912026 | URN: HC / 658U / 2026
Sahil Kumar S/o Bhagwan Das, Aged About 22 Years, Meghwalo Ka Bass Narwana Kerwada Ahore District Jalore
----Petitioner
Versus
1.
State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary Home Dept. Govt.
Of Raj. Secretariat Jaipur
2.
The Superintendent Of Police, Jalore
3.
Sho, Ps Shivpura Dist. Pali
4.
Sho, Ps Madhavpura Ahemdabad
5.
Sho, Ps Bhadrajun Dist. Jalore
6.
Satya Narayan, R/o 1209-9 Neelkanth Mahadev Ki Chali Matra Bhawani Vav Aasarwa Ahemdabad City Civil Hospital Ahemdabad Gujarat
7.
Chandrika W/o Satya Narayan, R/o 1209-9 Neelkanth Mahadev Ki Chali Matra Bhawani Vav Aasarwa Ahemdabad City Civil Hospital Ahemdabad Gujarat
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Ms. Saeena Bano for
Mr. Sampat Prajapat
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Deepak Choudhary, GA-cum-AAG
Mr. Daud Khan, CI, SHO,
P.S. Shivpura, District Pali.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
10/08/2026
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. The present habeas corpus petition has been filed by the petitioner, who claims himself to be a live-in-partner of the corpus
[2026:RJ-JP:37955-DB] (2 of 2) [HC-418/2026] Mst. ‘R’ and it is stated that the corpus Mst. ‘R’ is in illegal detention of the private respondents.
3. In pursuance of the directions issued by this court, the corpus Mst. ‘R’ has been produced before this Court.
4. We have conferred with the corpus Mst. ‘R’. She stated that she is 26 years of age and is pursuing her post B.Sc. Course, understanding her well being fairly well. She stated before us that she is capable of taking decisions in the best of her interest. She stated that she is happily living with the private respondents, who are her parents without any pressure from any side. She stated that she is a friend of the present petitioner, but they never live in live-in-relationship. She has expressed her desire to go and live with her parents only.
5. In view of the statements made by the corpus Mst. ‘R’ before us, this Court is convinced that the corpus Mst. ‘R’ is not in illegal detention of any person including private respondents.
6. The present habeas corpus petition is, therefore, fails, and the same is hereby dismissed.
7. The amount deposited by the petitioner in pursuance of the directions issued by this Court on 09.07.2026 stands forfeited.
8. The investigating agency is directed to see to it that the corpus Mst. ‘R’ reaches her residence safely. (BHUWAN GOYAL),J (VINIT KUMAR MATHUR),J 35/Nitin Prajapat