Rajasthan High Court
HC/485/2026 of SUSHILA DEVI Vs THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 10 August 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR D.B. Habeas Corpus Petition No. 485/2026 CNR: RJHC010801242026 | URN: HC / 770U / 2026 Sushila Devi W/o Prabhu Ram, Aged About 43 Years, Resident Of Meghwal Vas, Rajpura, Po Balda, District Sirohi, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan,
[2026:RJ-JP:38028-DB]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
AT JODHPUR
D.B. Habeas Corpus Petition No. 485/2026
CNR: RJHC010801242026 | URN: HC / 770U / 2026
Sushila Devi W/o Prabhu Ram, Aged About 43 Years, Resident Of Meghwal Vas, Rajpura, Po Balda, District Sirohi, Rajasthan.
----Petitioner
Versus
1.
The State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Home Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2.
The Superintendent Of Police, District Sirohi Raj.
3.
The Station House Officer, Police Station Sirohi Sadar, District Sirohi Rajasthan.
4.
Dinesh S/o Shri Jethaji, Resident Of Village Nerwa, Tehsil And District Sirohi Rajasthan.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Pritam Solanki
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Deepak Choudhary, GA-cum-AAG
Mr. Bhagwan Singh, SI
Mr. Jagdish Kumar, HC-618
Ms. Janukumari, MFC
Mr. Arjun Singh, HC-371,
P.S. Sirhoi, Sadar, District Sirohi.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
10/08/2026
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. The present habeas corpus petition has been filed by the petitioner, who is the mother of the corpus Mst. ‘J’ stating therein that the corpus Mst. ‘J’ is in illegal detention of the respondent No.4.
[2026:RJ-JP:38028-DB] (2 of 2) [HC-485/2026]
3. In pursuance of the directions issued by this court, the corpus Mst. ‘J’ has been produced before this Court.
4. We have conferred with the corpus Mst. ‘J’. She stated that she is 23 years of age, having educational qualification of 10th class, who understands her well being quite well. She stated before us that she has solemnized marriage with the respondent No.4 of her own free will and she is living with him happily without any pressure from any side. She stated that she is not in illegal detention of any person including respondent No.4.
5. In view of the statements made by the corpus Mst. ‘J’ before us, this Court is convinced that the corpus Mst. ‘J’ is not in illegal detention of any person including respondent No.4.
6. The present habeas corpus petition is, therefore, fails, and the same is hereby dismissed.
7. The investigating agency is directed to see to it that the corpus Mst. ‘J’ reaches her residence safely. (BHUWAN GOYAL),J (VINIT KUMAR MATHUR),J 1/Nitin Prajapat