Rajasthan High Court
SAW/1220/2024 of KUNAL KUMAR Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 5 August 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 1220/2024 CNR: RJHC010959672024 | URN: SAW / 1963U / 2024 Kunal Kumar S/o Shri Magan Lal, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Ward No. 16, Pindwara, Sirohi, Rajasthan. ----Appellant Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Local
[2026:RJ-JP:36752-DB]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
AT JODHPUR
D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 1220/2024
CNR: RJHC010959672024 | URN: SAW / 1963U / 2024
Kunal Kumar S/o Shri Magan Lal, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Ward No. 16, Pindwara, Sirohi, Rajasthan.
----Appellant
Versus
1.
State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Local Self Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
2.
The Director-Cum-Joint Secretary, Directorate Local Self Government Department, Jaipur.
3.
The District Collector, Sirohi.
4.
Shri Mahendra Kumar Purohit, Revenue Inspector, Presently Holding The Post Of Executive Officer, Municipal Board, Pindwara, District Sirohi.
----Respondents
For Appellant(s)
:
Mr. Ankur Mathur
Mr. Harshwardhan Thanvi
Ms. Divya Bapna
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Rajesh Panwar, Sr. Adv. & AAG
assisted by Mr. Ayush Gehlot
HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR. SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEET PUROHIT
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
05/08/2026
1. The present appeal has been rendered infructuous as the respondent No.4, who was given the charge of Executive Officer of the Municipal Board, Pindwara, District Sirohi has been shifted by the State Government and the challenge to his appointment, therefore, does not survive.
[2026:RJ-JP:36752-DB] (2 of 2) [SAW-1220/2024]
2. The question regarding the locus of the appellant-petitioner in challenging the appointment is left open to be examined in some other suitable case.
3. The appeal stands dismissed as having become infructuous.
4. All the pending application(s) also stand disposed of accordingly. (SANJEET PUROHIT),J (SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA),ACJ 10/Pooja Dubey