Rajasthan High Court

SAW/1030/2025 of CRIF HIGH MARK CREDIT INFORMATION SERVICES PVT. LTD. Vs SAPPHIRE WELL MICROFINANCE ASSOCIATION on 5 August 2026

Cites 1, Cited by 0

JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 1030/2025 CNR: RJHC010679072025 | URN: SAW / 1948U / 2025 Crif High Mark Credit Information Services Pvt. Ltd., Having Its Registered Office Address At Fof B 04,05,06, 4Th Floor, Art Guild House, Phoenix Market City, Lbs Marg,

[2026:RJ-JP:36913-DB]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

AT JODHPUR

D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 1030/2025

CNR: RJHC010679072025 | URN: SAW / 1948U / 2025

Crif High Mark Credit Information Services Pvt. Ltd., Having Its Registered Office Address At Fof B 04,05,06, 4Th Floor, Art Guild House, Phoenix Market City, Lbs Marg, Kurla (W), Mumbai -

400070.

----Appellant

Versus

1.

Sapphire Well Microfinance Association, Having Its Registered Address At Sn 2, Milan Hotel, Jaipur Road, Sri Dungargarh, Bikaner, Rajasthan 331803.

2.

Reserve Bank Of India, 4Th Floor, Amar Building, Sir P.m.

Road, Mumbai - 400001.

3.

Reserve Bank Of India, Jaipur Branch, Ram Bag Circle, Ton Road, Jaipur - 302052.

----Respondents

For Appellant(s)

:

Mr. Navneet Singh Birkh

For Respondent(s)

:

Ms. Akshita Singh for

Mr. Rajat Dave

HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR. SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEET PUROHIT

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

1

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

Order

05/08/2026

1. The learned Single Judge has decided the writ petition without issuing notices to the respondents. A restraint order has also been passed as against the appellant.

2. We feel that before we take up the appeal, the appellant must ought to file a review petition in view of the law laid down by the Apex court in the case of Ram Janam Singh vs. State of UP AIR 1994 SC 1722.

[2026:RJ-JP:36913-DB] (2 of 2) [SAW-1030/2025]

3. If such a review petition is filed, the same shall be taken in light of the aforesaid judgment and examined on merits and the appellant may be given an opportunity of hearing. All the arguments may be taken up before the learned Single Judge in defense as being put up before us in appeal.

4. Till the review petition is decided, the effect and operation of the impugned order dated 15.05.2025 shall remain stayed.

5. The appeal is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. (SANJEET PUROHIT),J (SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA),ACJ 38/Divya Prajapat

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead