Rajasthan High Court
CW/2129/2020 of KEWAL CHAND Vs INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LIMITED on 4 August 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16221/2019 CNR: RJHC010720222019 | URN: CW / 34119U / 2019 Kailash Chandra S/o Shri Bhoora Ram, Aged About 38 Years, Resident Of Meghwalon Ka Bass, Panchunda Kala, District Pali (Raj.). ----Petitioner Versus 1. Indian Oil
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16221/2019
CNR: RJHC010720222019 | URN: CW / 34119U / 2019
Kailash Chandra S/o Shri Bhoora Ram, Aged About 38 Years, Resident Of Meghwalon Ka Bass, Panchunda Kala, District Pali (Raj.).
----Petitioner
Versus
1.
Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Through Its Chief General Manager, Registered Office G-9, Ali Yavar Jung Marg, Banda (East), Mumbai-450001.
2.
The Chief Area Manager, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Indian Oil Bhawan, Sector-12, Chopasni Housing Board, Jodhpur.
3.
Shri Prem Chand Bairwa S/o Shri Bhola Ram Bairwa, Resident Of Village Manyapura, Post Bhilkhera, Tehsil Mahwa, District Dausa-321613.
----Respondents
Connected With
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2129/2020
CNR: RJHC010094492020 | URN: CW / 4841U / 2020
Kewal Chand S/o Shri Ottaram, Aged About 49 Years, R/o Village Kantaliya, District Pali.
----Petitioner
Versus
1.
Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Through Its Chief General Manager, Registered Office G-9, Ali Yavar Jung Marg, Bandara (East), Mumbai - 450001.
2.
The Senior Area Manager, (Marketing Division) Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Indane Area Office, Sector-12, Chopasni Housing Board, Jodhpur.
3.
Prem Chand Bairwa S/o Bhola Ram Bairwa, R/o Village Manyapura, Post Bhilkhera, Tehsil Mahwa, District Dausa -
321613.
----Respondents
(2 of 3)
[CW-16221/2019]
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Jatin Khatri for
Mr. Nrapen Shanker Acharya
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Muktesh Maheshwari with
Mr. Aidan Choudhary
Mr. Piyush Sharma for
Ms. Akshiti Singhvi
JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
04/08/2026
1. Matter comes up on interim application No.02/2026 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.16221/2019 submitted by the respondent No.3 for dismissing the instant petitions as the same have become infructuous in light of the judgment passed by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Mrinmoy Maity vs. Chhanda Koley and Others while deciding Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.30152/2018.
2. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that when the matter was listed before this Court on the last occasion i.e. on 05.07.2022, this Court deferred the matter only on the ground that the issue involved in these petitions is pending before the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Mrinmoy Maity (supra). Counsel submits that now the Hon'ble Apex Court has dismissed the aforesaid SLP (Civil) No.30152/2018 vide order dated 18.04.2024. Hence, the issue involved in the instant petitions has already been set at rest and nothing more is required to be adjudicated.
3. Per contra, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner opposed the prayer, but he is not in a position to controvert the aforesaid submission.
(3 of 3) [CW-16221/2019]
4. Considering the arguments put forward by learned counsels for the parties and looking to the fact that the issue involved in these petitions has already been set at rest by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Mrinmoy Maity (supra), this Court find no reason to take a different view.
5. Accordingly, both the instant writ petitions stand dismissed. The stay applications and all pending applications, if any, also stand dismissed. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J KuD/103-104