Rajasthan High Court
CMA/1094/2026 of SANJAY KUMAR Vs SANGEETA SINGH on 3 August 2026
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR D.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 1094/2026 CNR: RJHC010197362026 | URN: CMA / 2122U / 2026 Sanjay Kumar S/o Vijay Singh, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Ward No. 22 Sangriya, Tehsil Sangriya, District Hanumangarh Raj. ----Appellant Versus Sangeeta Singh W/o Sanjay
[2026:RJ-JP:36004-DB]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
AT JODHPUR
D.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 1094/2026
CNR: RJHC010197362026 | URN: CMA / 2122U / 2026
Sanjay Kumar S/o Vijay Singh, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Ward No. 22 Sangriya, Tehsil Sangriya, District Hanumangarh Raj.
----Appellant
Versus
Sangeeta Singh W/o Sanjay Kumar, Aged About 34 Years, D/o Late Shri Sher Singh R/o Ward No. 28, Sangriya, At Present Residing At Houseno. D/34, Fahetpur Veri, Har Sawroop Colony, New Delhi. 110074
----Respondent
For Appellant(s)
:
Ms. Daya Gulsar.
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Deepak Chandak.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MUNNURI LAXMAN
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
03/08/2026
1. The present appeal has been filed by the appellant-husband challenging the order dated 06.01.2026 passed by the Additional District Judge, Sangariya, District Hanumangarh in Civil Misc. Application No. 45/2025 (CIS No. 20/2025) whereby, the interim maintenance was granted pending the divorce petition filed by the appellant-husband.
2. By the impugned order, the Family Court has fixed the interim maintenance of Rs. 2500/- per month in favour of the respondent-wife. Aggrieved by the same, the present appeal is filed.
3. The learned counsel appearing for the appellant submits that the appellant is illiterate and he has no means to pay
[2026:RJ-JP:36004-DB] (2 of 2) [CMA-1094/2026] Rs. 2500/- per month as directed by the Court below and the amount granted by the Family Court is excessive. Therefore, he prayed that the amount may be reduced.
4. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent-wife submits that the respondentiwfe at present is having no means of livelihood and apart from maintenance, a child is also with her. In view thereof, no interference is required in the present appeal.
5. We have gone through the impugned order and the quantum of maintenance granted by the Family Court. In the circumstances of the present case, the quantum appears to be no excessive.
6. Considering the fact that the respondent-wife is also taking care of her child, we do not find any merits in the present appeal. Therefore, the present appeal is dismissed.
7. The amount already deposited in compliance of the interim order, the same shall be liable to be adjusted in final arrears, if any.
8. All the pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of. (SANGEETA SHARMA),J (MUNNURI LAXMAN),J 34-PKS/Mohan Kishan