Rajasthan High Court
CW/19939/2025 of MAHENDRA SINGH GURJAR SON OF SHRI KARAN SINGH GURJAR Vs STATE OF RAJASTHAN on 19 December 2025
2025:RJ-JP:51427
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 19939/2025 Mahendra Singh Gurjar Son of Shri Karan Singh Gurjar, Aged About 63 Years, Resident of Basra, Dausa, Rajasthan-303313 ----Petitioner Versus 1. State of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Revenue Department,
[2025:RJ-JP:51427]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 19939/2025
Mahendra Singh Gurjar Son of Shri Karan Singh Gurjar, Aged About 63 Years, Resident of Basra, Dausa, Rajasthan-303313
----Petitioner
Versus
1.
State of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Jaipur.
2.
The District Collector, Dausa.
3.
Sub-divisional officer (SDO), Bandikui District Dausa.
4.
Tehsildar, Bandikui, District Dausa.
5.
Sub-Tehsildar, Abhaneri, Tehsil Bandikui, District Dausa.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Ram Ratan Gurjar
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. V.D. Gathala, AGC
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP TANEJA
Order
19/12/2025
1. By way of this writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the notice dated 03.12.2025 issued under Section 91 of the Rajasthan Land Revenue Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') by Sub-Tehsildar Abhaneri, Bandikui, District Dausa for removal of encroachment on the subject land.
2. The petitioner has directly approached this Court, without filing the reply to the said notice. Hence, this Court is not inclined to go into the merits of the case.
3. This Court is of the view that the petitioner is required to approach the concerned respondent, who has issued the impugned notice to the petitioner, by way of filing reply/
Page 1 of 2
[2025:RJ-JP:51427] (2 of 2) [CW-19939/2025] representation along-with the relevant documents in support thereof.
4. It is directed that in case, any such reply / representation is submitted by the petitioner within a period of one week from today, the concerned respondent will look into the matter and pass reasoned and speaking order, expeditiously as early as possible, preferably within a period of three weeks thereafter strictly in accordance with law.
5. For a period of four weeks, no coercive action be taken against the petitioner.
6. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of.
7. All pending applications, if any, shall also stand disposed of. (SANDEEP TANEJA),J AVINASH GULERIA /7
Page 2 of 2
Loading citations and judicial treatment…