Sikkim High Court
WP(C)/11/2026 of Dr Daffne Tamang Vs High Court of Sikkim and Ors. on 30 July 2026
HIGH COURT OF SIKKIM Record of proceedings CNR: SKHC01-000033-2026 W.P. (C) No. 11 of 2026 DR. DAFFNE TAMANG .... PETITIONER VERSUS HIGH COURT OF SIKKIM & ORS. .... RESPONDENTS Date: 30.07.2026 CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE BHASKAR RAJ PRADHAN, J. For Petitioner : Mr. N. Rai, Senior
Court No.3
HIGH COURT OF SIKKIM
Record of proceedings
CNR: SKHC01-000033-2026
W.P. (C) No. 11 of 2026
DR. DAFFNE TAMANG
.... PETITIONER
VERSUS
HIGH COURT OF SIKKIM & ORS.
.... RESPONDENTS
Date: 30.07.2026
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE BHASKAR RAJ PRADHAN, J.
For Petitioner
:
Mr. N. Rai, Senior Advocate (Senior Legal Aid-Pro
Bono Counsel) with Mr. Kazi Sangay Thupden,
Advocate (Legal Aid-Pro Bono Counsel).
For Respondent :
Mr. Tashi Rapten Barfungpa, Senior Advocate.
No.1.
For Respondent :
Page 1 of 2
Nos.2 & 3.
For Respondent :
None.
No.4
For Respondent :
Mr. Tenzing Thinlay Lepcha, Advocate.
No.5.
Mr. Aniketh Kumar Sharma, Advocate.
For Respondent :
Dr. Doma T. Bhutia, Senior Advocate (Legal Aid No.6.
Counsel).
Mr. Anirudh Gupta, Advocate (legal Aid Counsel).
For Respondent :
Mr. Abhinav Kant Jha, Advocate.
No.7.
For Respondent :
Mr. Sushant Subba, Advocate.
Nos.8 & 9.
.………..
1. The learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that respondent no.1 has duly dealt with the petitioner’s concerns and addressed the issues involved in the writ petition. Consequently, the petitioner does not have any further grievances.
2. In view of the categorical statement made by the learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner the writ petition stands disposed of.
Judge Index: yes/No to/ Internet: yes/No
Page 2 of 2
Loading citations and judicial treatment…