CRLP/16996/2026 of Kondapalli Ganesh Vs The State of Telangana, on 16 October 2026

ORDER

1. This Criminal Petition is filed under Sections 480 & 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BNSS’) praying this Court to enlarge the petitioner- accused on bail in connection with Crime No.234 of 2026 of Yellandu Police Station, Bhadradri-Kothagudem District, registered for the offence punishable under Section 318(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhitha, 2023.

2. Heard Ms.B.Rachana Reddy, learned Senior Counsel, representing Mr.Mohd Baseer Riyaz, learned counsel for the

petitioner-accused and Sri D. Arun Kumar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent–State.

3. Learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner submits that prosecution has not explained the delay, surrounding circumstances, and conduct attributed in the complaint in a satisfactory manner and the same are matters requiring detailed appreciation during trial. The Petitioner-accused specifically denies having cheated or dishonestly induced any person to deliver property. There is absolutely no material to establish that at the inception of the alleged transaction, petitioner-accused had any dishonest or fraudulent intention to deceive the complainant. Allegations are vague, omnibus and general in nature. The dispute is in its true nature and the substance arises out of business transaction and the existence of a monetary dispute does not automatically transform in civil liability into a criminal offence. Petitioner-accused is arrested on PT Warrant and produced before the concerned Court on 30.09.2026. Entire investigation is completed and prayed to enlarge the petitioner-accused on bail.

4. Counter is filed by respondent. It is stated in the counter affidavit that during the course of investigation, Investigating Officer came to know that petitioner-accused was already arrested by EOW, P.S., Cyberabad on 14.08.2026 in respect of Crime No.86 of 2026 registered for the offences under Sections 316(2), 318(4) of the BNS and Section 5 of the TSPDFE Act, 1999. Investigating Officer executed PT Warrant on 30.09.2026 against the petitioner-accused, since then he is in jail. Petitioner-accused is involved in seven (7) other cases. As per the statements of L.Ws.1 and 2, petitioner-accused induced the complainant to invest in a wine shop partnership at Yellandu and collected Rs.60,00,000/- from her on 23.04.2026 and prayed to dismiss the petition.

5. Petitioner-accused is arrested in Crime No.86 of 2026 of PS EOW, Cyberabad Commissionerate on 14.08.2026 and was remanded to judicial custody. Offences in the aforesaid Crime are under Sections 316(2) and 318(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhitha, 2023 and Section 5 of the TSPDFE Act, 1999. Petitioner-accused has filed Crl.P.No.15534 of 2026 for grant of regular bail, the same came to be allowed on 05.10.2026 with conditions.

6. Banoth Ashok Kumar has lodged a report before PS Yellandu on 16.08.2026 i.e., remand of the petitioner-accused. It is stated in the complaint that the accused has promised to make the complainant as a partner in wine shop business activities and in total he paid an amount of Rs.60,00,000/- on different dates and the accused has cheated him. Basing on the said complaint, FIR came to be registered under Section 318 (4) of the BNS.

7. Investigation Officer has filed PT Warrant before the concerned Magistrate on 19.09.2026, it was regularized on 30.09.2026 and the petitioner-accused was sent to jail in the said crime, since then he is in jail. Counter filed by respondent goes to show that L.Ws.1 and 2 are examined. Petitioner-accused has filed anticipatory bail petition No.13994 of 2026 before this Court, which came to be allowed on 01.09.2026. It is observed in the above said order that the petitioner is directed toappear before the SHO, Yellandu, Bhadradri Kothagudem District, within one week from the date of receipt of a copy of the order but the police has regularized the P.T. warrant on 30.09.2026 for the reasons best known to them.

8. Investigation is in respect of documentary evidence which is already collected by the respondent. Since investigation is at fag end, detaining the petitioner-accused further in judicial custody will not serve the purpose.

9. In the result, petition is allowed subject to the following conditions: i. The petitioner-accused shall execute a personal bond for a sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only), with two sureties for a like sum each to the satisfaction of the learned Prl.Junior Civil Judge-cum- Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Yellandu. ii. The petitioner-accused shall appear before the concerned SHO in between 10:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., on every Sunday, Tuesday and Thursday for a period of eight (8) weeks or till filing of charge sheet whichever is earlier, for the purpose of investigation and thereafter, as and when required. iii. The petitioner-accused shall abide by the conditions stipulated in Section 437(3) of Cr.P.C. (presently, Section 480(3) of the BNSS). iv. The petitioner-accused shall not directly or indirectly influence, threaten, or induce any of the prosecution witnesses.

v. In the event of violation of any of the above conditions, the prosecution is at liberty to file an application for cancellation of bail.

10. Accordingly, the Criminal petition is allowed.

Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. __________________________ B.R.MADHUSUDHAN RAO, J Date: 16.10.2026 ssm

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.R.MADHUSUDHAN RAO

CRIMINAL PETITION No.16996 of 2026 CNR.No.HBHC010715312026 DATE: 16.10.2026

ssm