Telangana High Court
CRLP/16440/2026 of ULLENUGALA ARAVIND Vs The State of Telangana on 15 October 2026
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.R.MADHUSUDHAN RAO CRIMINAL PETITION Nos.16507 and 16440 of 2026 (CNR.Nos.HBHC010694852026 & HBHC010689842026) DATE: 15.10.2026 Crl.P.No.16507 of 2026 BETWEEN: Alwala Nagaraju …..Petitioner-A1 And The
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.R.MADHUSUDHAN RAO
CRIMINAL PETITION Nos.16507 and 16440 of 2026
(CNR.Nos.HBHC010694852026 & HBHC010689842026)
DATE: 15.10.2026
Crl.P.No.16507 of 2026
BETWEEN:
Alwala Nagaraju
…..Petitioner-A1
And
The State of Telangana,
Rep. by its Public Prosecutor,
High Court at Hyderabad,
Through the Gachibowli Police Station,
Cyberabad Commissionerate.
…..Respondent-Complainant
Crl.P.No.16440 of 2026
BETWEEN:
1.Ullenugala Aravind
2.Mogilisetty Bharath Kumar
…..Petitioners-A2 and A3
And
The State of Telangana,
Rep. by its Public Prosecutor,
High Court at Hyderabad,
Through the Gachibowli Police Station,
Cyberabad Commissionerate.
…..Respondent-Complainant
Page 1 of 5
COMMON ORDER
1. These Criminal Petitions are filed under Sections 480 & 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BNSS’) praying this Court to enlarge the petitioners-A1 to A3 on bail in connection with FIR.No.1571 of 2026 of Gachibowli Police Station, Cyberabad Commissionerate. The offences alleged against the petitioners-A1 to A3 are punishable under Sections 329(4), 109, 308(5), 119(2), 78, 351(2), 61 r/w 3(5) of BNS.
2. Heard Sri P. Vikas Raj, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri D. Arun Kumar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent–State.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners-A1 toA3 are falsely implicated in the case. The material objects relied upon by the prosecution including the alleged vehicle and mobile phones are already seized. The allegations regarding conspiracy and common intention are matters requiring appreciation of evidence and cannot be conclusively determined at this stage. Petitioners-A1 to A3 were arrested on 04.09.2026 and they were remanded to
Page 2 of 5
judicial custody on 05.09.2026, since then they are in jail, entire investigation is completed and prayed to enlarge the Petitioners-A1 to A3 on bail.
4. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that investigation is completed and charge sheet is filed on 13.10.2026 before the concerned Court, number has to be assigned.
5. Smt. A. Kalyani Reddy has lodged the complaint before P.S. Gachibowli on 02.09.2026. It is stated in the complaint that A1-Nagaraju Alwala allegedly trespassed into her villa by breaking the side door and demanded an amount of Rs.10,00,000/- and upon her questioning, he behaved aggressively, caught hold of her legs when she attempted to escape, causing her to fall on floor and sustained a dislocation to her right shoulder. A1 has threatened her and left the premises, thereafter she was shifted to Continental Hospital for treatment.
On 01.09.2026, A1 came near the complainant’s residence in his car Hyundai Exter bearing registration No.TS-08-AP-1127 and allegedly recorded a video of the Villa and sent threatening videos and messages to her
Page 3 of 5
husband, basing on the said complaint, FIR came to be registered.
6. Petitioners-A1 to A3 were arrested on 04.09.2026 and they were remanded to judicial custody on 05.09.2026, since then they are in jail.
7. Remand case diary goes to show that respondent has altogether examined 13 witnesses.
8. Injury certificate of the complainant goes to show that she received grievous injuries.
9. Since charge sheet came to be filed before the concerned Court, the question of the petitioners-A1 to A3 influencing the witnesses does not arise. Hence, petitioners-A1 to A3 are entitled to be enlarged on bail, subject to the following conditions: i. The petitioners-A1 to A3 shall execute a personal bond for a sum of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only) each, with two sureties for a like sum each to the
Page 4 of 5
satisfaction of the learned II Additional Junior Civil Judge-Cum-X Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Ranga Reddy District, at Prashanth Nagar, Kukatpally, Cyberabad. ii. The petitioners-A1 to A3 shall not influences the witnesses connected to the case. iii. It is made clear that if the condition imposed by this Court is violated, the prosecution is at liberty to file an application for cancellation of the bail.
10. Accordingly, these Criminal petitions are allowed.
Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. __________________________ B.R.MADHUSUDHAN RAO, J Date: 15.10.2026 TU
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.R.MADHUSUDHAN RAO
CRIMINAL PETITION Nos.16507 and 16440 of 2026 (CNR.Nos.HBHC010694852026 & HBHC010689842026) DATE: 15.10.2026
TU
Page 5 of 5
Loading citations and judicial treatment…