Telangana High Court

CRLP/17073/2026 of Gosala Sindhu Vs The State of Telangana on 15 October 2026

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.R.MADHUSUDHAN RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO i 17073 0F 2026 Between: AND 1 Gosala Sindhu, D/o Ramakrishna, Age.29 years, Occ. Nurse, R/o

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

THURSDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.R.MADHUSUDHAN RAO

CRIMINAL PETITION NOi 17073 0F 2026

Between:

AND

Gosala Sindhu, D/o Ramakrishna, Age.29 years, Occ. Nurse, R/o Srinagar, Gannavaram, Andhra pradesh.

...Petitioner/Accused

The state of relangana, Rep by its pubric prosecutor for Home High court for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad.

The Station House Officer, Begumpet police Station, Telangana.

... Res pondenUCompla inant

Page 1 of 3

Petitron under section 4g3(1)(b) of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminar ietitr:on, the High c"r.t rrv'0"

pleased ]o.19l-a{mgdrfv the surety amount stipurated in condition "No

1i) oi tt,e'oair

order daled 29 -09.2026 passed in criminar petitron No. 4472 or 2026, by permitting the petitioner/ Accused lo execute personal bonds with two sureties't"i A, s,oool (Rupees Five Thousand only) each, instead of Rs.20,000/_ each ^

This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the lrlemorandum of Grounds of criminar petition and upon heiring the arguments of Sri p. Akhir Raj, Advocate for the Petitioner and srr D. Arun Ku"mar, Additionar pubric prosecutor on behalf of the Respondents.

The Court made the following: ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.R.MADHUSUDHAN RAO

CRIMINAL PETITION No.17O73 of 2o26

CNR.No. HBHCO 1O696782026

DATE: 15.10.2O26

BETWtrtrN

Gosala Sinclhu

Petitioner - A(lcused

And

1 .The S rate of Teiangana

Represenled b].its F\rbllc Prosecutor for Home, Hrgh Court for ihe State of Telangana, H1'd e ra bad

2.The Station House Officer,

Begumpet Police Station,

Telangana.

Respondents

ORDER

1. This memorandum ol Criminal Petition is filed under Section a83 (1)(b) of t1-re Rharatr-va Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) pra-ving this Court to relerx/ modi[, the suret--r amount stipulated in condition No.(i1 of the barl order dated 29.O9.2026 passed in Cr1.P.No.4472 of 2026, b1, permitting the petitioner - accused to execute personal bonds r," ith tlr,o sureties for Rs.5,000/- each instead of Rs.20,O0O/ - each.

2. He'ard Sri P.Akhil Raj, learned counsel for the pelitioner and Sri D.A1rn Kumar learned Additional public prosecutor appearing lor the rcsponri ents -r

Page 2 of 3

BRMR,J Crl P No.l7O73 ot 2026

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that ttre petitioner

- accused is enlarged on bail in Crl.M.P.No.4472 of 2026 in Crime No.535 of 2026 of PS Begumpet, Secunderabad on 29.09.2026 directing her to execute personal bond of Rs.20,000/- with two sureties each for like sum to the satisfaction of the learned XI Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Secunderabad. Petitioner - accused belongs to poor and economically weaker famrlies and not in a position to furnish solvency sureties of Rs.20,000/- each and prayed to reduce the same to Rs.5,000/- each.

4. Petitioner - accused is tried in Cr.No.535 of 2026 of PS Begumpet, Secunderabad, she made an application before the learned Sessions Court for grant of regular bail vide Crl.M.P.No.4472 of 2026 and the same came to be allowed vide order dated 29.09.2026 by enlarging the petitioner - accused on executing a person bond of Rs.20,000/- with two sureties each for Iike sum to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court.

5. It is stated in the petition that petitioner - accused is poor and economically weaker, she is not in a position to furnish solvencies as ordered by the learned Sessions Court.

6. Considering the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner, surety amount of Rs.20,00O/- each is reduced to To, BRMR,J Crl.P No. 17073 of 2026 Rs.5,OOO/- each r,r.ith tr.o sureties. The other conrlitions imposed by thr: learned Sessions Court remain unaltered.

7. Accordingl-v this Criminal Petition is allow'ed. Miscclianeous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. SD/-P.C.SULEKHA DEVI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ,TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER

1. The Xl Additronal Chief Judicial lvlagistrate at Secunderabad.

2. The Station House Officer. Begumpet Police Statron, Begumpet Division

3. One CC to Sri P Akhil Ral, Advocate [OPUC]

4. Two CCs to Public Prosecutor High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad [OUT]

5. Two CD Coptes C) KAM/BA V

HIGH COURT DATED: 1511012026

ORDER

CRLP.No.17073 of 2026 ALLOWING THE CRIMINAL PETITION 5.1ATE Op Y cI

s L'r ea 2$l$ v a)

i -a.' + () r^ta .'f,! (;'rr

- l6,lolto ,)

Page 3 of 3

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead