CRLP/6513/2026 of Transaction Analysts India Private Limited, Vs The State of Telangana on 15 October 2026

1. The State of Telangana, Represented by its Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad.

2. Central Crime Station(CCS),, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad-s0O 029

3. P. Vinay Kumar, S/o Arogyam, Aged about 38 years, Occ Finance Manager, O/o. The Commisioner, ESD(Meeseva), Road No. 7 , Banjara Hills, Hyderabad - 34

4. The Commisioner,, Electronic Service Delivery (Meeseva), Department of lnformation Technology, Electronics and Communications, Road No.7, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad -34 Rep by T Ravi Kiran ...Respondent Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased toto quash the FIR No. 74 ol 2026 on the file of Central Crime Station CCS Basheerbagh Hyderabad registered for the alleged offences under Section 316(2) 318(4) of BNS and Sections 66-C 70, 72,43 rlw 66 of the lT Act

l.A. NO: 'l OF 2026 Petition under section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings including arrest of the petitioners pursuant to FIR No. 74 of 2026. l.A. NO: 2 OF 2026 Petition under Section 359 of BNSS/320 of Cr.p.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal petition, the High court may be pleased to permrt the petitioner to compound the offences under Section 316(2),318(4) of BNS and Sections 66C,70,72,43ttw 66 of the tTAct in FIR No 74 of 2026 dated 15-04-2026 on the file of central crime station Basheerbagh Hyderabad by acquitting the Accused/Petitioner. LA-lt9: 3 OF 2026 Between:

P. Vinay Kumar, S/o Arogyam, Aged about 38 years, Occ Finance Manager, 0/o. The Commisioner, ESD(Meeseva), Road No.7, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad - 34 ...Petitioner/Complai nant Transaction Analysts lndia Private Limited,, 1st floor, Satyam Arcade, 4, 1st Cross Rd, BTM 2nd Stage, Kuvempu Nagar, BTM 2nd Stage, BTM Layout, Bengaluru, Karnataka 560076 Represented by its authorised Signatory Sreenivasulu aged about

- yeari AND

1. ...RespondenUAccused

2. The state of relangana, Represented by its public prosecutor, High court for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad.

3. Central Crime Station(CCS), Basheerbagh, Hyderabad-sOO 029

4. The Commisioner, Electronic Service Delivery (Meeseva), Department of lnformation Technology, Electronics and Communications, Road No. 7, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad -34 Rep by T Ravi Kiran ...Res pondents Petition under Section 359 of BNSS/320 of Cr,p.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal petition, the High court may be pleased to record the compromise in the and compound the offence under Section 316(2), 318(4) of BNS and Sections 66C, 70, 72,43 rlw 66 of the lT Act in FIR No. 74 ol 2Q26 15-04-2026 on the file of Central Crime Station CCS Basheerbagh Hyderabad by acquitting the Accused/Petitioner. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri M/s.Ramesh Babu Vishwanathula, Advocate for the Petitioner and Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.2 and Sri G.Srinivas, Advocate for the Respondent No.3. The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE JUWADI SRIDEVI INTERLO CUT RY APPLICATIONNos.2 & 30F 2026 IN/AND CRIMINAL PETITION No.6513of 2026 (cNR No. HBHCO7O2Z8IO2O26) DATE D: 15rH oCTOBER,2 26 B tw n: Transaction Analysts India private Limited , . Petitioner AND Tl^e State of Telangana and others , . . Respondents COMMO N ORDER: This Criminal petition is filed by the petitioner_accused ser:king to quash the proceedings against the petitioner_ accused in FIR No.74 of 2026 on the file of the Central Crime Station (CCS), Basheerbagh, Hyderabad, registerecl for the alleqed offences under Section 316(2),3lg(a) of the BNS ancl Sections 66-C,70,72, 43 read with Section 66 of the iT Act.

02. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing for the either side, that during pendency of the present Criminal Petition, the parties have compromised the mafter and accordingly, I.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2026 have been filed to record the compromise between them and to compound the offences.

03, Vide order dated 07.10.2026, this Court directed the parties along with their respective counsel to appear before the Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, High Court for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad, for identification and to submit a report.

04. Pursuant to the above said direction issued by this Court, the parties have appeared and the Secretary' High Coutt Legal Services Committee, has identified the parties and submitted a report, dated 08'10'2026 and the same is placed on record. 05, In view of the above, I'A'Nos'2 and 3 of 2026 are allowed. Consequently, this Criminal Petition is allowed and the proceedings against the petitioner-accused in FIR No'74 of 2026 on the file of the Central Crime Station (CCS)' Basheerbagh, Hyderabad, are hereby quashed' As a sequel, miscellaneous applications' if any pending' shall stand closed. /,TRUE COPY// SD/. P.C,SUILEKHA DEVI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER To,

1. The Xll Additional chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Nampally' Hyderabad

2. TheStationHouseofficer'lnspAdmin(DD)PoliceStation,Hyderabad., G

3. The Central Crime Station(CCS), Basheerbagh, Hyderabad-sOO 029

4. One CC to M/s.Ramesh Babu Vishwanathula Advocate [OPUC]

5. One CC to Sri G.Srinivas, Advocate [OPUC]

6. Two CCs to PUBLIC PROSECUTOR High court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad IOUT]

7. Two CD Copies Encl:(A cop;- of Memorandum of Compromise) ba 4y

HIGH COURT DATED: 15110t2026

COMMON ORDER

INTERCLOCUTORY APPLICATION NOS. 2 &3 OF 2026 IN/AND CRLP.No.6513 of 2026 \ 6tat'ts oi tr or) I rrE't ',t{ ALLOWING BOTH IA'S 2 & 3 OF 2026 AND CRLP \5 s$ N& * ,.5 \D \o\,}lc

OMISE MO UMOFC

It is submitted that the defacto complainant is the employer of the 4th respondent herein has frled a complaint dated 15-04-2026 on the file of Central Crime Station Basheerbagh Hyderabad against the accused herein and the same was registered as F'I R'No 74 of2026 dated 15-04-2026 under Section 316(2)'318(4) of BNS and section 66C'70'7 2'43rlw 66 of the IT act' It is submitted that as perthe order by this Hon'ble court in CRLP N o 6'71612026 dt l4l55l2226the Petitioner has diliger-rtly carried out the transfer process and successfully handed over all the data pertaining to T-wallet It is submitted that the 4tr' Responde.t has issued a letter da *u :u'n'u :: 13lOT l2!26appreciating the cooperation and support extended by Petitioner rn transferring the T-wallet data Hence the 4rl' Respondent being the employer of the Defacto Cornplainant intend to withdraw the criminal case filed with CCS Hyderabad vide FIR No ' 't 4l2O26at-td t-.eqnested the Deputy Comrnissioner of CCS DD Hyderabad and Assrstant Commissioner of Police DD Hyderabad to cooporate at their end to withdraw the case' It is further submitted that in order to meet the ends ofjustice the offence can be compounded with the permission of the Hon'ble Court as per the section 359 (2) BNSS-2023 ' Hence the petitioner is hereby prays that this Hon'ble court may be Pleased to record the compromise between the both parties to allow the Criminal Petition by quashing the

tr proceeclings in F.I.R.No. 11of 2026 dated l5-04-2026 on the llle of the central crime Station Basheerbagh Hyderabad by acquitting the Accused and pass such other order or orders irs may deern fit and proper in the circumsta*.tflflf;ffi.tlmnf mfmU ti Counst:l fo e petitioner Hyderabad Dt: -(t9-2026 p \lt.yY-wmau, Respondent No.3 / Delacto Cornplainant Petit

:i /D MISE FILED D THE RE FTHE NO.3 . . . ..ResPondents PETITIONER lJo OOFCO ACCUS MPRO ED AN HALF O DENT INT MEM o SE NBE PON 1 . It is submitted that the delacto complainant is the employee of the 4th respondent herein has filed a cornplaint dated 15-04'2026 on the file of Central Crime Station Basheerbagh Hyderabad against the accused herein and the same was registered as F.I.R.No. '74 of 2O26dated 15-04-2026 under Section 316(2)'318(4) of BNS and 66C,'70,72,43r1w 66 of the IT act'

2. It is submitted that the Petitioner has diligently carried out the transfer process and successfully handed over all the data pertainir-rg to T-wallet'

3. It is submitted that the 4th Respondent has issued a letter datecl 2210612026 and 1310712026 appreciating the cooperation and sttpport extended by Petitioner in fansfering tl,re T-wallet data. Hence r.he 4th Responder-rt being the employer of the Defacto Cornplainant intend to rvithdraw the crirrinal case filed with CCS Hyderabad vide FIR. No. 7 4r2o26ar.Ld requested the Deputy comnrissioner of ccS DD Hyderabad and Assistant Cotlrnissioner of Police DD Hyderabad to cooperate at their end to withdraw the case'

4. It is submitted that the respondents 3 and 4 are filing the petition for compounding the offenies and also fiting tl.re affidavits and joint memo by both parties after signing ar-rd they are requesting this Hon'ble court to record the compromise in the criminal petition filed by the petitioner' i il

I The petitioncr and respondents 3 herein pray that this lion'ble cor-rrt ma! be pleased to c,ompound the oifence by granting pennission as contempliLted under Sec 359'-

(2) ofBNSS-2023andtoquashtheproceedingsinF'I'RNo'74of2026dated15-04'2026 on the file of the Central Crirne Station Basheerbagh Hyderabad offences under Section 316(2),318(1) of BNS and Section 66C'70 "72'43rlw 66 of the I'f act and pass such other order or orders as ma1' deetn fit and proper in the circutlstaffiffi 0ddP'i[lHd i li case. O Counsel f,lr etitioner rysEEff \ P6titio p P .tlttks',cu/ Respondent No.3 / Defacto Complainant Hyderabad Dt: -09-2026