Telangana High Court

CRLP/16332/2026 of Rudrakshi Narasimha (A-6) Vs The State of Telangana on 14 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.R.MADHUSUDHAN RAO CRIMINAL PETITION No.16332 of 2026 CNR.No. HBHC010687292026 DATE: 14.10.2026 BETWEEN: Rudrakshi Narasimha …..Petitioner-Accused No.6 And The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor,

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.R.MADHUSUDHAN RAO

CRIMINAL PETITION No.16332 of 2026

CNR.No. HBHC010687292026

DATE: 14.10.2026

BETWEEN:

Rudrakshi Narasimha

…..Petitioner-Accused No.6

And

The State of Telangana,

Rep. by its Public Prosecutor,

Through the Station House Officer

Haliya Police Station, Nalgonda District

…..Respondent-Complainant

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

1. This Criminal Petition is filed under Sections 480 & 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BNSS’) praying this Court to enlarge the petitioner-A6 on bail in connection with Crime No.117 of 2026 of Haliya Police Station, Nalgonda District, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 103(1), 61(2) read with Section 3(5)

of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 3(!) (f) and 3(2)(v) of SC/ST (POA) Act.

2. Heard Sri V.Yadu Krishna Sainath, learned counsel for the petitioner-A6 and Sri D. Arun Kumar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent–State.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner-A6 is in judicial custody since 27.05.2026, earlier bail petition filed by him came to be dismissed on 01.09.2026, charge sheet came to be filed before the concerned Court and the same is numbered as SC.SPL.No.133 of 2026, detaining the petitioner-A6 further in the judicial custody is not required and prayed to enlarge the petitioner-A6 on bail.

4. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that the charge sheet came to be filed on 15.08.2026 and thereafter the bail application filed by the petitioner-A6 came to be dismissed on 01.09.2026 and prayed to dismiss the petition.

5. LW-1-M.Vinod has lodged a complaint before PS Haliya on 17.05.2026 stating that 1) N.Shashikala, 2) G.Navanitha,

3) A.Renuka and their family members were quarreling with his sister-Sumalatha and threatened that they would harvest the palm oil fruits at any cost and if obstructed they would kill his sister and her daughter and executed accordingly. Basing on the said complaint FIR came to be registered under Sections 103 and 61(2) of BNS against A1-N.Shashikala, A2- G.Navanita, A3-A.Renuka, A4-N.Venkanna, A5-G.Ramesh, A6- R.Narsimha and A7-R.Mahesh.

6. Petitioner-A6 is arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 27.05.2026, since then he is in jail. Petitioner-A6 has filed Crl.P.No.13060 of 2026 for grant of regular bail before this Court, the same came to be dismissed vide common order, dated 01.08.2026 with an observation that specific overt acts are attributed against him. It is to be noted here that filing of the charge sheet by the prosecution on 15.08.2026 is not preferred in the earlier bail order filed by the petitioner-A6 which is dismissed on 01.09.2026. Charge sheet came to be filed before the concerned Court and the SC.SPL.No.133 of 2026. Accused Nos.1 to 4 and 7 were enlarged on bail by this Court vide common order, dated 01.10.2026 since then charge sheet came to be filed in witnesses by the petitioner does not arise. Hence, petitioner-

A6 is entitled to be enlarged on bail, subject to the following conditions: i. The petitioner- A6 shall execute a personal bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty Five thousand only), with two sureties for a like sum each to the satisfaction of the learned Special Sessions Judge for SC/Sts-cum-II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Nalgonda. ii. The petitioner-A6 shall not directly or indirectly influence, threaten, or induce any of the prosecution witnesses. iii. The petitioner- A6 shall abide by the conditions stipulated in Section 437(3) of Cr.P.C.(presently, Section 480(3) of the BNSS). iv. It is made clear that if any of the conditions imposed by this Court are violated, the prosecution is at liberty to file an application for cancellation of the bail.

8. Accordingly, the Criminal petition is allowed.

Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. __________________________ B.R.MADHUSUDHAN RAO, J Date: 14.10.2026 ssm

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.R.MADHUSUDHAN RAO

CRIMINAL PETITION No.11279 of 2026

Date: 25.08.2026 yvl

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead