Telangana High Court

WP/32922/2026 of Harshith Reddy Vs The State of Telangana on 14 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE JUWADI SRIDEVI WRIT PETITION NO: 32922 OF 2026 Between: Harshith Reddy, S/o P. Jitendar Reddy, Aged about 23

13257l

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

WEDNESDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE JUWADI SRIDEVI

WRIT PETITION NO: 32922 OF 2026

Between:

Harshith Reddy, S/o P. Jitendar Reddy, Aged about 23 years, Occ. Student, R/o Plot No. 113, 8-7-941113, Dwaraka Nagar, Hasthinapuram South,Ranga Reddy District.

...PETITIONER

AND

'L The State of Telangana, Rep by its Principal Secretary, Higher Education Department, Telangana Secretariat, Hyderabad

2. Jawaharlal Nehru Technology University, Represented by its Vice Chancellor Kukatpally Hyderabad

3. Spoorthy Engineering College, Represented by its Principal Nadergul Village Meerpet Mandal Ranga Reddy District 501510

...RESPONDENTS

.-===-!-

Petitlon under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order, or direction, more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, Order, or Direction DECLARING the action of Respondent No.3 in withholding the original certificates of the Petitioner demanding tuition fees for unstudied subsequent academic years as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, and contrary to the principles laid down in D. Vaishnavi v. State of Telangana (W.P. No. 21137 of 2019 CONSEQUENTLY DIRECTING Respondent No.3 College to return all original certificates mentioned above to the Petitioner under due acknowledgment within a time-bound period of one (01) week DIRECTING Respondent No. 2 University/Body to instruct Respondent No. 3 in writing to release the certificates forthwith.

l.A. NO: 'l OF 2026

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to DIRECT

Respondent No. 3 College to forthwith return all original certificates of the Petitioner viz. Secondary School Certificate (SSC) Marks Memo, lntermediate Marks Memo, lntermediate Study / Bonafide Certificates, Class Vl to X Study / Bonafide Certificates, Transfer Certificate (TC), any other original documents submitted at the time of admission, pending disposal of the above writ petition.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI GURRAM VENKAT RAMANA

Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SRI M.VAMSHI KIRAN, AGP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION

Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SRI PRABHAKAR PERI, SC FOR JNTUH

Counsel for the Respondent No.3: -

The Court made the following: ORDER

-

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTIC E JUWADISRIDEVI

WRIT PETtTroN No.32922 ot 2026

CNR No. HBHC01 0671662026

DATED 14TH OCTOBER 2026

Between:

Harshith Reddy

AND

The State of Telangana,

Rep.by its Principal Secretary,

Higher Education Department,

Telangana, Secretariat, Hyderabad and others Petitioner Respondents

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

:ORDER:

This Writ Petition is filed seeking the following relief: "lo lssue a writ order or direction more pafticularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus o.r any other appropriate Writ, Order or Direction lytarinq th,e action of respondent No S in witnniiiig the original ceftificates of the petitioner demandinig tuition fees for unstudied subsequent academic yeais as illegat arbitrary unconstitutionat anA contrary io ini principles laid down in D.Vaishnavi u Siute if Telangana (W.p No 21137 of 2O1g),onuiilnii dirg?lng respondent No.3-Coltege to ,etiii 'itt original cefiificates mentioned aboie to the ieiitioir und.er due acknowtedgment within a time_b,ouid ggrad 9f one (01) week directing responAent io.i Uniuersity/Body to instruct Reipondent tUo S- i writing to release the ceftificates foihwith and to pass. .. "

2. Heard [Vr. Gurram Venkat Ramana, learned counsel for the petitioner, [Vrr. [vr.M.vamshi Kiran, Iearned Assistant Government .-

Lst,ce luv!ad Sndevr qp 12977-1076 PleaderforHigherEducationappearingforrespondentNo'1and tVlr. Prabhakar Peri, learned Standing counsel for JNTU appearing for respondent No 2 lnspite of service of notice on respondent No.3, there is no representation on behalf of respondent No 3'

3. The case of the petitioner is that he appeared for the EAtvICET-2021 entrance examination and secured admission to the B.Tech.(CSE/CS) course rn respondent No.3-college under the At the time of admission, he submitted all his management quota. original certificates, (SSC) Marks StudY/Bonafide including the Secondary School Certificate tVlemo, lntermediate lvlarks Memo, lntermediate X StudY/Bonafide to resPorrdent No 3- his studies owing to Certificates, Class Vl to Certificates, and Transfer Certificate (TC) College. Subsequently, he discontinued financial constraints and unforeseen family exigencies Thereafter' he requested respondent No'3-college to return his original certificates. However, respondent No.3-college refused to release the same, unless the entire tuition fee for the third and fourth academic years, during which the petitioner did not pursue his studies, was paid. Hence, the present writ petition'

--- lustrce luwadr 5nd€vr tlp_32922_1076

4. Learned counser for the petitioner submits that the petitioner requires his original certificates to secure employment and to support his family, as he is facing financial difficulties and unforeseen family exigencies. He further submits that the action of respondent No.3 in withholding the original certificates submitted by the petitioner at the time of his admission is illegal and arbitrary and the same is causing serious prejudice to his career opportunities. Therefore, he seeks a direcuon to respondent No.3-coilege to return the petitioner's original certificateq.

5. Perused the record lt is not in dispute that the petitioner has secured admission in respondent No.3-college under lr/anagement quota and he has discontinued his studies and his originar certificates referred to above were presently in the custody of respondent No.3. The said certificates, being personal and academic credentials, are undoubtedly the property of the petitioner. rn such circumstances, respondent No.3-college has no authority whatsoever to retain the said certificates and the retention of the petitioner's originar certificates by respondent No.3 is whoily unjustified and cannot be sustained. Even assuming that the college has any monetary claim against the petitioner, withhording his originar certificates cannot be .-

@p 12971 -)a16 adopted as a mode of enforcing such claim' the proper remedy' if any available to respondent No 3- college is to proceed in accordance with law for recovery of its dues' but not retain the petltioner's original certificates.

7. For the foregoing reasons' this Writ Petition is disposed of ' directing respondent No 3 to return the original certificates referred toabovetothepetitionerwithinaperiodofone(01)weekfromthe date of receipt of a copy of this order' No costs' Pending miscellaneous applications' if any' shall stand closed ii J Sd/.K.V.O,NARASI BABU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY' To SEC OFFICER Education DePartment, Telangana I The PrinciPal Secretary, Higher Secretariat, Hyderabad, State of Tela in" Vi"" Chincellor, Jawaharlal N ngana. ehru TechnologY University, KukatPallY

Hyderabad

3. The Principal, spoorthy Engineering college, Nadergul Village Meerpet Mandal Ranga Reddy District 501510 +. o"" Cc t" s"ir eunirnna vLrlxnr RAMANA' Advocate toPUCl ;. O;; CC i" SNI PRABHAKAR PERI, SC FOR JNTUH TOPUC]

6. Two ccs to Gp FOR ijici;R ibu-cnrroru, Hish court for the state of Telangana, at HYderabad [OUT]

7. Two CD CoPies PSKi_-_ *"/€--* l:,z4

HIGH COURT DATED: 1411012026

ORDER

WP.No.32922 ot 2026 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS. CC TODAY S{ATE

..+ \j 11 ocI zslt L) ? o)- .\- * I \J"t Us \*

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead