Telangana High Court
CRLP/17130/2026 of M/s. AFFINE FORMULATIONS LIMITED, Vs THE STATE OF TELANGANA, on 14 October 2026
THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J SREENIVAS RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 171 30 0F 2026 Between: M/s. AFFINE FORMULATTONS L|MITED, Rep. by its Managing Director, 28l10,f
[ 3303l
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
WEDNESDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J SREENIVAS RAO
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 171 30 0F 2026
Between:
M/s. AFFINE FORMULATTONS L|MITED, Rep. by its Managing Director, 28l10,f afuali Dewas Naka, lndore - 452010, Madhya pradesh.
SRI PRADHYUMN NYATI, S/o. Shri.Mohanlal Nyati, aged about.44 years, Director of Mis. Affine Formulations Limited, 28110, T;kali Dewas l\aka, lndore - 452010.
SRI VIJAY KUMAR NYAT|, S/o.Shri.Radheshyam Ji Nyati, aged about.58
years, Director of M/s. Affine Formulations Limited, 2gl10, Tilwali Dewas Naka, lndore - 452010
...PETITIONERS/ACCUSED Nos.1 TO 3
THE STATE OF TELANGANA, Rep. by its pubtic prosecutor, High Court for lf SEE_"ILqlangana, Hyderabad.
...Resplndenr
M/s. GODAVARI DRUGS L|M|TED, May Fair Complex, First Ftoor,sardar Patel Road, secunderabad, Rep. by its Authorised Representative srihari Gajjela Defacto Complainant Petition under section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated rn the Memorandum of Grounds of criminar petition, the High court may be pteaseJ to call for the records pertaining to crl.M.p. No.1550 of 2026 in s.T.c. r.r-o.ozi+ of 2025
consequently set aside the order dated 16,09.2026 passed in crl.M.p. No.1550 of 2026 by the court of the XV Additional Judge-cum-XlX Additional chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Secunderabad
l.A. NO: 1OF 2026
Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated rn the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal petition, the High court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings including stay of operation ind execution oi the Non- Bailable warrant issued against the petitioners/Accused Nos.2 and 3 in S.T.c.
No.62'14 of 2025 on the file of the XV Additional Judge-cum-XlX Additionat chief Metropolitan Magistrate, secunderabad pending disposal of the criminal petition.
AND
1.
Page 1 of 5
This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Ms. Kanya Kumari, counsel representing M/s Hyderabad Law Firm, Advocate for the Petitioners and Mr.
Jithender Rao Veeramalla, Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and None Appeared for the Respondent No.2.
The Court made the following: ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J.SREENIVAS RAO
CRIMINAL PETITION No.17130 OF 2026
CNR No.HBH C0107 05602026
Date:14.10.2026
Between
M/s. Affine Formulations Limited and 2 others
..Petitioners
AND
The State of Telangana, and another
..Respondents
ORDER
This Criminal Petition is filed aggrieved by the order dated 16.09.2026 passed by the learned XV Additional Judge-cum-XlX Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Secunderabad, ln Crl.M.P.No. 15 50 of 2026 in S.T.C.NI.N o.6214 of 2025. wherein the application filed by the petitioners seeking to recall the Non- Bailable Warrant (NBW) issued against them was disrnissed
2. Heard Ms.Kanya Kumari, learned counsel representing M/s.Hyderabad Law Firm, for the petitioners and Mr.Jithender Rao Veeramaila, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No. 1
Page 2 of 5
l. Notice in respect of respondent No 2 is dispensed with soleiy on the ground that the petitloners are not seeking any relief against respondent No.2 and is onll seeking recall ol the NBWs issued by the icameil trial Court
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the ' 'los'l to 3 in S"f c NI'No' 6214 0f 2025 petit ioners are accuscd '\ ancl are facing prosecution lor the otfence punishable under Section I 33 o1' the Ne gotiable . Instruments Act' I 881 ' Petitioner No' 1' M,'s. Alfine Formulations Limited' is a company' and petitioners Nos.2 and i are its Directors Petitioners Nos'2 and 3 are residents of lndore and coulcl not appear before the leamed trial Coufi on 09 03.2026 due to unavoidable circumstances' Consequently' the Ieamed trial Court issued non-bailable r'r'arrants (NBWs) against tht petitioners.'lhereatter' the petitioners fi1ed Crl'V'P'No l550 of 2(i26. irrvokine Section 70(2) of the Code of Crinrinal Procedure' 1973 (Cr.l'.C.), seeking,recall of the NBWs However' the learned trial Cor.u.t d ismissed the said apptication without assigning any reasons, ri'hich is contrar-v to law She further submits that the petitioner: are readl'and rvilling to abide by any conditions that mal be iirposed b1' this Court. Unless the NBWs issued against the petitioners are reca11ed, the petitioners would be put to great hardship.
5. Having considered the rival submissions made by the respective parties and after perusal of the material available on record, it reveals that the petitioners are arrayed as accused Nos.l to 3 in S.T.C.(NI) No.6214 of 2025 and are facing prosecution for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The learned trial Court issued non-bailable warrants (NBWs) against the petitioners. Thereafter, on 03.06.2026, the petitioners filed Crl.M.P.No.1550 of 2026, invoking Section 70(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.), seeking recall of the NBWs issued against them. However, by order dated 16.09.2026, the learned trial Court dismissed the said application by passing the following order: "Accused called absent when this petition is pending, so it is dismissed. "
6. During the course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners will appear before the leamed trial Court on 05.11.2026. the date on which the matter is posted for hearing
Page 3 of 5
'7. Taking into consideration the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, the impugned order dated 16.09.2026 passed by the learned trial Court is liable to be set aside and, accordinglv. the same is hereby set aside. Consequently, the NBWs issuecl against the petitioners are recalled, subject to the following conditions: i) The petitioners shall execute a personai bond for a surn of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) each with tu'o sureties to the satisfaction of the leamed trial Cour1. I'he petitioners shall file undertaking alfidavit before the h'ial Courl that they will appear before the trial Court u'henever their presence is required, and also they shall represent the mattel through their counsel each and every date of adjournment, in default, the learned trial Court is entitled to proceed with the matter. in accordance with law. ii)
Page 4 of 5
8. Accordingly, the Criminal petition is disposed of. Miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. i ! SD/- MOHD. OSMAN ALI BAIG, ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// += rrn o To, 8'" sEc FFICER
1. The XV Additional Judge-cum-XlX Additional chief Metropolitan Magiskate, Secunderabad
2. The Station House Officer, Begumpet police Station, Hyderabad. 3 Qne CC to M/s Hyderabad Law Firm IOPUCI
4. Two ccs to Public Prosecutor High court for the State of rerangana, at Hyderabad [OUT]
5. Two CD Copies KAM
HIGH COURT DATED: 1411012026
ORDER
CRLP.No.17130 of 2026 \ DISPOSING OF THE CRIMINAL PETITION fcofe 5 t+\ru\z-p kr ).\ f- {IF i C - s +' q$ $l \,,, C"t- + + H
Page 5 of 5
Loading citations and judicial treatment…