Telangana High Court

CRLP/16067/2026 of Syed Tayiz Ali Vs The State of Telangana, on 14 October 2026

COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.R.MADHUSUDHAN RAO CRIMINAL PETITION No.16067 of 2026 C.N.R.NO. HBHC010664632026 DATE: 14.10.2026 BETWEEN: Syed Tayiz Ali …..Petitioner-Accused And 1. The State of Telangana, Through SHO, P.S. Abids Road,

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.R.MADHUSUDHAN RAO

CRIMINAL PETITION No.16067 of 2026

C.N.R.NO. HBHC010664632026

DATE: 14.10.2026

BETWEEN:

Syed Tayiz Ali …..Petitioner-Accused

And

1. The State of Telangana,

Through SHO, P.S. Abids Road, Hyderabad, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad. …..Respondent- No.1-State

2. xxxxxxxx

…..Respondent- No.2-Complainant

ORDER:

1. This Criminal Petition is filed under Sections 480 & 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BNSS’) praying this Court to enlarge the petitioner-A1 on bail in connection with Crime No.242 of 2026 of Abids Police Station, Hyderabad, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 69, 88 and 238 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS).

Page 1 of 5

2. Heard Shaik Abdul Akram, learned counsel for the petitioner-accused and Sri D. Arun Kumar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent–State.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner-accused is inncoent and the allegations made by the de facto complainant are totally false. Ingredients of Section 69 and 88 of BNS do not attract to the present case. Petitioner-accused and the complainant continued the relationship from the year 2024-2026 for more than one year and she voluntarily met him at various locations. Petitioner- accused is in jail since 13.08.2026, entire investigation is completed and prayed to enlarge the petitioner-accused on bail.

4. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that the prosecution has filed an application to record the statement of the victim under Section 183 of BNSS and a separate application is also filed to secure the DNA sample of the petitioner-accused. Both the applications are pending consideration before the learned Trial Court.

Page 2 of 5

5. Notice got issued to the de-facto complainant is served and proof is filed to that effect.

6. De facto complainant has lodged a report before Abids Police Station on 03.08.2026. It is stated in the complaint that she came into contact with the Hotel Manager, Syed Tayiz Ali. In the year 2025, petitioner-accused proposed his love towards her and she accepted and he promised to marry her, believing his words, they entered into physical relationship in City Park Hotel in July, 2025, which continued till March, 2026 and she became pregnant, her pregnancy was terminated through abortion. Petitioner-accused has also taken an amount of Rs.1,00,000/- from her. Basing on the said complaint, FIR came to be registered.

7. Petitioner-accused is arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 13.08.2026, since then, he is in jail.

8. Remand Case Diary goes to show that respondent has examined altogether 13 witnesses in support of the case.

9. This Court is conscious of the fact that the prosecution has filed two separate applications to record the statement of

Page 3 of 5

the victim under Section 183 of BNSS and to secure DNA samples of the petitioner.

10. Petitioner-accused is in jail since 13.08.2026, as on date it is 62 days. Since, investigation is at the fag end, detaining the petitioner-accused further in judicial custody will not serve the purpose. Hence, the petitioner-accused is entitled to be enlarged on bail, subject to the following conditions: i. The petitioner-accused shall execute a personal bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty Five thousand only), with two sureties for a like sum each to the satisfaction of the learned X Additional Sessions Judge, Hyderabad. ii. The petitioner-accused shall cooperate with the investigation agency for his DNA samples. iii. The petitioner-accused shall appear before the concerned SHO between 10 a.m. to 5 p.m., on every Sunday for a period of Eight (8) weeks or till filing of charge sheet whichever is earlier, for the purpose of investigation, and thereafter, as and when required.

Page 4 of 5

iv. The petitioner-accused shall abide by the conditions stipulated in Section 437(3) of Cr.P.C.(presently, Section 480(3) of the BNSS). v. The petitioner- accused shall not directly or indirectly influence, threaten, or induce any of the prosecution witnesses. vi. It is made clear that if any of the conditions imposed by this Court are violated, the prosecution is at liberty to file an application for cancellation of the bail.

11. Accordingly, the Criminal petition is allowed.

Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. __________________________ B.R.MADHUSUDHAN RAO, J Date: 14.10.2026 prat

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.R.MADHUSUDHAN RAO

CRIMINAL PETITION No.16067 of 2026

Date: 13.10.2026 prat

Page 5 of 5

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead