Telangana High Court
CRLP/16074/2026 of Narla Naga Vishnu Vineeth Vs The State of Telangana, on 14 October 2026
COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.R.MADHUSUDHAN RAO CRIMINAL PETITION No.16074 of 2026 C.N.R.NO. HBHC010675112026 DATE: 14.10.2026 BETWEEN: Narla Naga Vishnu Vineeth …..Petitioner-Accused No.1 And The State of Telangana, Through SHO, Keesara
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.R.MADHUSUDHAN RAO
CRIMINAL PETITION No.16074 of 2026
C.N.R.NO. HBHC010675112026
DATE: 14.10.2026
BETWEEN:
Narla Naga Vishnu Vineeth …..Petitioner-Accused No.1
And
The State of Telangana,
Through SHO, Keesara P.S., Medhcal-Malkajgiri, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad.
…..Respondent-Complainant
ORDER
1. This Criminal Petition is filed under Sections 480 & 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BNSS’) praying this Court to enlarge the petitioner-A1 on bail in connection with Crime No.800 of 2026 of Keesara Police Station, Medchal-Malkajgiri District, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 69, 316 (2) and 318 (4) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS).
Page 1 of 5
2. Heard A. Kranti Kumar Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner-A1; V. S. Sudhakar, learned counsel for the complainant and Sri D. Arun Kumar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent–State.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner-A1 is falsely implicated in the case with an intention to forcibly marry the complainant without his consent only because she loves him. Petitioner-A1 is arrested and remanded to the judicial custody on 08.08.2026, since then, he is in jail. Entire investigation is completed and prayed to enlarge the petitioner-A1 on bail.
4. Notice got issued to the de-facto complainant is served and proof is filed to that effect and she made appearance before this Court on 07.10.2026.
5. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that statement of the victim under Section 183 of BNSS is recorded on 13.10.2026.
Page 2 of 5
6. Learned counsel for the de-facto complainant submits that the peitioner-A1 has not made out any case for grant of bail and prayed to dismiss the same.
7. De facto complainant has lodged a report before Keesara Police Station on 08.08.2026. It is stated in the complaint that she came into contact with Narla Naga Vishnu Vineeth through online and initially, they became friends and subsequently he proposed to marry her, believing his words, she accepted his proposal and continued her relationship for about one year. Accused took her to the temple and married her secretly, subsequently stated that the alleged marriage was not valid and that he had merely tied the thread casually. Accused has obtained Rs.2,00,000/- from her as dowry, continued physical relationship. Basing on the said complaint, FIR came to be registered.
8. Petitioner-A1 along with A2 and A3 were arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 08.08.2026, since then, he is in jail.
9. Remand Case Diary goes to show that respondent has examined altogether 10 witnesses in support of the case.
Page 3 of 5
10. The statement of the victim under Section 183 of BNSS is already recorded on 13.10.2026. Since investigation is completed, detaining the petitioner-A1 further in judicial custody will not serve the purpose. Hence, the petitioner-A1 is entitled to be enlarged on bail, subject to the following conditions: i. The petitioner-A1 shall execute a personal bond for a sum of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees twenty thousand only), with two sureties for a like sum each to the satisfaction of the learned II Additional District and Sessions Judge-cum-I Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge-cum-II Special Sessions Judge for Fast Tracking the cases relating to the Atrocities against Women-cum-Family Court, Medchal- Malkajgiri. ii. The petitioner- A1shall appear before the concerned SHO between 10 a.m. to 5 p.m., on every Sunday for a period of Eight (8) weeks or till filing of charge sheet whichever is earlier, for the purpose of investigation, and thereafter, as and when required.
Page 4 of 5
iii. The petitioner-A1 shall abide by the conditions stipulated in Section 437(3) of Cr.P.C.(presently, Section 480(3) of the BNSS). iv. The petitioner- A1 shall not directly or indirectly influence, threaten, or induce any of the prosecution witnesses. v. It is made clear that if any of the conditions imposed by this Court are violated, the prosecution is at liberty to file an application for cancellation of the bail.
11. Accordingly, the Criminal petition is allowed.
Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. __________________________ B.R.MADHUSUDHAN RAO, J Date: 14.10.2026 prat
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.R.MADHUSUDHAN RAO
CRIMINAL PETITION No.16074 of 2026
Date: 14.10.2026 prat
Page 5 of 5
Loading citations and judicial treatment…