Telangana High Court

WP/34489/2026 of Darni @ Abanamoni Srikanth Yadav Vs The State of Telangana on 13 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO: 34489 OF 2026 Between: Darni @ Abanamoni Srikanth Yadav, Adopted Son

[ 32s5 I

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

TUESDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR

WRIT PETITION NO: 34489 OF 2026

Between:

Darni @ Abanamoni Srikanth Yadav, Adopted Son S/o. Late Laxmaiah, Aged aboul 24 years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. Thimmareddyguda Village, Shabad Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.

...PETITIONER

AND

1. The State of Telangana, Rep by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat At Hyderabad.

2. The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District,

3. The Tahsildar, Shankarpally, Ranga Reddy District.

4. Jangampet Manikreddy, S/o. Bal Reddy, H.No.1-6, Pilligonda Village, Shankarpally Mandal, Rangareddy District.

5. Gundu Srinivas, H.No.3-5-1114, Raj Mohallah, Shamsheerbagh, Hyderabad, Telangana.

...RESPONDENTS

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of, Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent No.2 in not considering the petitioner's Copy application dated, 20-06-2026 is illegal and in violation of Articles 14,21 and 300-A of the Constitution of lndia and consequently direct the respondent No.2 to dispose of the Copy application dated, 20-06-2026 and furnish the certified copies of records.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI G.ASHOK

Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3: AGP FOR REVENUE

The Court made the following: ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT TTYDERABAD

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. SHRAVAN KUMAR

W.P. No.34489 of 2026

CNR No.HBHCOIOT 06962026

Date:13.1O.2O26

Between:

Darni (a'. Abanamonr Srikanth Yadav

Petitioner

And

The Statr of Telangana

Represented |w its Principal Secretar_\', Revenue Department.

Secretariat, I-lyderabacl and Four others Rr:spondents

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

Questioning the action of the respondent No.2 in not considering the petitioner's Copv Application datecl 2O.06.2026 petitionel liled the present rvrit petition u'ith a consequential pre1...er to direct thr: respondent No.2 to dispose of the Copv Application dated 2C.06.20'.26 and to furnish the ccrtified copies of records.

2. The learned counsel for the pctitioner rt'ould submr'_ thar the petitioner made an Application vide D.No.3473 ol- 2025 dated 20.06.202:6 seeking fbr issuance of certified copies ol C.C. of the Docket order dirted )O.06.2026; C C. of the 'lahsildar Repcrt/Xerox copy; C.Cl. of the lou'er Court file B/2500 of 20O57Xerox copy; C.C. of clLurters filed b1' respondents and C.C. of the hdditional Affidavil filed b,"" petitioner each in t\\'o sets.

w.P. No.34489 2026

3. After arguing at length, the learned counsel for thc petitioncr, on instructron, r,vould submit that the pecitioner is not pressrng for a Ccrtified Copy of lhe 'l'ahsrldar Report and pral,ed to pass a direction [o the respondent No.2 to furnish remaining ccrtified copies as they are b.eing the public docurnents.

4. The learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue would submit that they have no objcction for consiCering the Application d,ated 20.06.2026 of the petitioner and to furnish lhe copies sought for therein except to furnisl-r the Certified Copy of the Tahsilciar Report as it was an interual correspondence.

5. In that view of the matter, recording the aforesaici suhmlssions 3nj with the consent of the lcarned counsel on either side, ..vithcut going into the merits of thc case, this vrril petition is disposed of directing the respondent I'1o.2 to consider the Application dated 20.06.2026 of the petitioner and to fttrnish the documents sought for therein except the C. C. of the Tahsildar Report, within a period of Two (02) weeks, from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

6. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposect of. There shal1 be no order as to costs.

t{vsK,J !r.P No.34449 2026 As a sequel, miscelLaneous applications, if an1"' pending, shall sta.nd closed /TTRUE COPY// SD/. P.PONNA KRISHNA AssrsrANr REB;RAR To, BSR SECTION OFFICER

1. The Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat At Hyderabad, State of Telangana

2. The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District.

3. The Tahsildar, Shankarpally, Ranga Reddy District.

4. One CC to SRI G.ASHOK, Advocate [OPUC]

5. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad [OUT]

6. Two CD Copies 'W.

HIGH COURT DATED: 1311012026

ORDER

WP.No.34489 of 2026 CC TODAY 1$$ E 51 ATE OT , q ( Fu)o \5$$ I o I llr ro es\'F' DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION, WITHOUT COSTS 0 Y

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead