WP/34412/2026 of ATTILLI RAVINDER REDDY, Vs The State of Telangana, on 13 October 2026

:: ORDER

Alleging inaction on the part of respondents No.2 to 4 in considering the representation dated 2g.07.2026 submitted by the petitioner, requesting police protection to protect his property from respondents No.5 to 9, the present writ petition has been filed.

2. Heard Mr. Gafar Mahamamd, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Sri B.Sridhar, learned Assistant Government pleader for Home, appearing for respondents Nos. I to 4.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is the absolute owner and possessor of land admeasuring Ac. 0_33 ANI)

- TMO,] wP_34412,2026 guntas in Surr,'ey No. 136 (Sub-Division Nos' 136/4' 1361E2' l36lE3 and l36lEEZ), comprising two poultry sheds' ar.rd land admeasuring Ac. 0-20 guntas in Survey No' 138' comprising one poultry shed' aggregating to a total extent of Ac'1-13 guntas in one compact bit' situated at Srirangapur Village, Kondurg Marrdal' Ranga Reddy District. Irle submitted that the petitioner purchased the said property under a registered sale deed and has been in peaceful possession and enjoyment thereof since the date of purchase' He further submitted that, owing to the interference and harasstnent by the unofficial respondents, the petitioner filed O'S'No'104 of 2018 on dre file of the Family Court-cum-II Additional District and Sessions Judge' Mahaboobnagar (hereinafter referred to as "the trial Court") and that the petitionel also filed I'A' No' 548 of 2018 in O'S No' 104 of 2018' seeking an ad interim injunction and upon hearing both sides' the trial Court, by order dated 02 '08 '2}lg ', granted an injunction restraining respondent No.5 herein, his followers and henchmen from interfering with the petitioner's peaceful possession and enjoyment of the subject property. It is submitted that aggrieved by the said order' respondent No. 5 herein preferred C'M'A' No' 894 of 2019 before this Court and filed I.A.No.1 of 2019 in the said C'M'A ' seeking suspension of the

- TMO,I wP 34412 2026 order dated 02.08.2019 and by order dated 23'08.2021, this Court suspended the order passed by the trial Court and that thereafter the petitioner filed I.A. No. I of 2024 in C.M.A.No.894 of 2019, seeking vacation of the interim order and by order dated28.04.2026, this Court vacated the interim order passed in I.A. No. 1 of 2019. 3.1 Learned counsel further submitted that, despite the subsistence of the injunction order, respondents No.5 to 9 trespassed into the subject property and threatened the petitioner due to which the petitioner approached the Kondurg Police Station and lodged a complaint on 26.07.2026; however, the police refused to receive the complaint. It is submitted that the petitioner also submitted a representation dated 26.07.2026 to respondents No.2 to 4, requesting police protection to safeguard his property from respondents No.5 to 9, but the police refused to receive the same and therefore, on 28.07.2026, the petitioner sent a representation/complaint to respondents No.2 to 4 by Speed Post, requesting police protection. It is the grievance of the petitioner that despite receipt of the said representation, respondents No.2 to 4 failed to take any action. Hence, the present writ petition.

- TMO,] \\tP _34412 242F,

4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, submitted that the petitioner had sent a representation dated. 28.07.2026 by post to respondent No.4. Upon receipt of the representation, the police made a petition entry and conducted an enquiry into the matter and that the enquiry revealed that the dispute between the petitioner and the unofficial respondents was civil in nature. It is submitted that upon completior.r of the cnquiry, the petitioner was advised to approach the competent civil Court for redressal of his grievance, and the complaint was closed as civil in nature on 03.08.2026 and that the same was communicated to the petitioner through the Petition Management System. It is further submitted that as of nou,, the petitioner did not obtain any specific police protection orders from any Court or authority, however, respondent No.4 will provide police protection to the petitioner and his property if there is any specific court orders.

5. Having regard to the rival contentions ar.rd the material on record, it is seen that the petitioner had obtained an order ofinjunction dated 02.08.2019 in I.A. No.548 of 2018 in O.S. No. 104 of 2018.

When a person in whose favour an injunction order has been passed G--

TMO,] wP _14412 2026 Sd/-K.V.O.NARSI BABU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR approaches the police seeking protection for the effective implementation of such order, the police authorities are required to consider the request and extend the necessary police protection to ensure due implementation of the orders passed by the competent civil Court.

6. In view of the above, this Court deems it fit and proper to dispose of the writ petition with a direction to the petitioner to submit a representation to the respondent police, speciffing the date, time and place at which police protection is required. Upon receipt of such representation, the respondent police shall consider the same and provide the necessary police protection in accordance with law.

7. With the above directions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous applications, if any, pending shall stand closed. //TRUE COPYII To SECTION OFFICER Iffif;:irtfrfl tecretary' Home Department, secretariat, state of reransana The Commissioner of police, Future City Commissionerate. lbrahimpatnam, Ranga Reddy Diskict. In#."S:y"":ommissioner of potice, Shad Nasar Zone, Future City ffi;|3:,,::J,o,::e officer, Kondurs porice station (L and o), Future city

J

t ly[r:ff.1?o|?, to* HoME, Hish court ror the state or reransana at

6. One CC to SRt GAFAR TMAHAMMAD, Advocate IOPUCI 7 . f wo CD Copies SA

C.C.TODAY HIGH GOURT DATED: 1311012026

ORDER

WP.No.34412 of 2026 DISPOSING OF THE W.P WITHOUT COSTS. :'.lATE oA

trco 1A (}$ 2$28 | r- a .$ ...f (