Telangana High Court
WP/33459/2026 of Bathoju Padma, Vs The State of Telangana, on 12 October 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TANGIRALA MADHAVI DEVI WRIT PETITION NO: 33459 OF 2026 Between: Bathoju Padma, W/o Narsimha Chary, Age 43
[ 321e ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF OCTOBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TANGIRALA MADHAVI DEVI
WRIT PETITION NO: 33459 OF 2026
Between:
Bathoju Padma, W/o Narsimha Chary, Age 43 years, Occupation ; Agriculture, Rl/o H.No. 2-11-433, Mahatma Nagar, Gopalpur Road, Hanamkonda - 506009.
...,.PETITIONER
AND
1 , The State of Telangana, Represented by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.
2. The Superintendent of Police, Mulugu District, Telangana.
3. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Mulugu Sub-Division, Mulugu District, Telangana.
4. The Station House Officer, Mulugu Police Station, Mulugu District, Telangana.
5. Munige Mallesh @ Ravanna, S/o Muthaiah, Age 55 years, Occ Mining Supervisor Fl/o. Mallampally (M), Mulugu (D).
6. Talapelli Ambedkar, S/o. Sammukomuraiah, Age 45 years, Occ Not known, Fl/o. Mallampally (M), Mulugu (D).
7. Mottu Ailaiah, S/o. Komuraiah, Age 55 years, Occ Not known, Rl/o.
Mallampally (M), Mulugu (D).
.....RESPONDENTS
Petition Under Article 226 ol the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or Direclion, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the official Respondent Nos. 2 and 4 in not acting on the complaints submitted by the Petitioner dated 20.09.2026 vide Petition lD MLG/TUULG-MULG/200926/00819 and dated 21.09.2026 respectively, and further Respondent No. 4 acting in active connivance with the Unofficial Respondent Nos. 5 to 7 by interfering with civil disputes, summoning the Petitioner and her family members to the police station, and coercing, threatening, and exerting unwarranted pressure upon them to enter into an unlawful compromise/settlement and trying to dispossess the Petitioner from the peaceful and lawful possession and enjoyment over the agricultural land admeasuring Ac. 15-1 0 Gts. (Out of Ac. 19-1 0 Gts.) in Sy.
No.22014 situated at Ramachandrapur Village, Mallampalli, Mulugu District, as being illegal, arbitrary, without jurisdiction, ultra vires, and violative of Articles 14, 19, 21 , and 300A of the Constitution of lndia, and consequently direct the official Respondent Nos. 2 and 4 to forthwith act upon the said complaints dated 20.09.2026
and 21 .09.2026 respectively in accordance with law, and further .direct the official Respondents, especially Respondent No. 4, not to interfere in any manner with the peacefu possession and enjoyment of the Petitioner over the sJbject land, not to summon the Petitioner or her family members to the police station except in accordance with law and not to coerce them to settle the matter at the behest of Unofficia I Respondent Nos. 5 to 7.
l.A.NO:1 OF 2026
Petition Under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent Nos. 2 to 4, more particularly Respondent No. 4, not to interfere in any manner with the peaceful and lawful possession and enjoyment of the Petitioner and her tamily members over the subject agricultural land admeasuring Ac. 15-10
Gts. (Oul of Ac. 1 9-10 Gts.) in Sy. No. 22014 situated at Ramachandrapur Village, Mallampalli, Mulugu District, and not to summon the Petitioner or her family members to the police station for forcing a compromise/settlement at the behest of the Unofficial Respondent Nos. 5 to 7, pending disposal of the main writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI T.RAHUL
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 4 : GP FOR HOME
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.S lo7 : - The Court made the following ORDER
rN rHE HrcH couRr Ffl+;;"_l.f,TE oF TELANGANA
TTTE HONOURABLE SMTJUSTICE TANGIRALA MADHAVI DEVI
WRIT PETITION No.33459 of2026
CNR No. TIBHc01068479202
DATE:12.10.2 026
Between:
Bathoju Padma
...Petitioner
AND
The State of Telangana and Six Others.
.Respondents
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Alleging that respondent No.3 is interfering with the possession of the petitioner's properry without there being any complaint whatsoever and thus, interfering in civil disputes between the petitioner and the unofficial respondents No.5 to 7, this writ petition has been filed.
2. The leamed counsel for the petitioner alleged that the petitioner and her family members are being calred to the police station without there being any case against them.
3. The leamed Assistant Govemment pleader for Home, on written instructions, submitted that the petitioner herein has given a complaint on 20.09.2026 and an inquiry was conducted into said complaint and thereafter, it was closed as ,civil in nature, on 21.09.2026.
.-I
fMD) W,P,No,t3d59 ol 2026 It is further stated that respondent No.6 had lodged a complaint against the brother-in-law of the petitioner on 22'09 '2026 and a case was registered vide Crime No.34912026 for the offence under Sections 329(3), 324(4) of BNS of Mulugu Police Station and the investigation hasbeencompletedandachargesheethasalsobeenfitedbeforethetr.ial Court and C.C. number is awaited. It is stated that except for conducting an ,nquiry into thc petitioner's complaint, there was no interference by the respondent Police.
4. In view of the same and particularly since there is no complaint against the petitioner herein over the subject properly' the respondent police are directed not to interfere with the possession of the petitioner's property and to follow due process of law' if any action is contemplated against the petitioner'
5. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of' There shall be no <trder as to costs.
6. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition' shall stand closed. Sd/-B.REKHA RAN. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //rRUE COPY/I
SECTION OFFICER to ', . ,nu Principal Secretary, Home Department' Secretariat' State of Telangana at HYderabad'
z. ii,"'srp"rintendent of Police' Mulugu District' Telanoana
3. The Deputy Supe'inienOent of PolLe' Mulugu Sub-bivision' Mulugu District' Telangana.
rtEFEElz
4. The Station House Officer, Mulugu Police Station, Mulugu District, Telangana.
5. Two CCs to GP FOR HOME, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT]
6. One CC to SRI T.RAHUL, Advocate [OPUC]
7. Two CD Copies SA
HIGH COURT DATED: 1211012026
ORDER
WP.No.33459 of 2026 DISPOSING OF THE W.P WITHOUT COSTS. I r: S TA;'a (l ) Co 14 0gT 2m$ * rl: , ' t ,l: c 'r-,'-, a