Telangana High Court
WP/34660/2026 of VISHAL EXTRUSION TECHNIQ LLP Vs The State of Telangana, on 12 October 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENW SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA WRIT PETITION NO: 34660 0F 2026 Between: 1. VISHAL EXTRUSION TECHNTQ LLP, Rep. by its
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF OCTOBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENW SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
WRIT PETITION NO: 34660 0F 2026
Between:
1. VISHAL EXTRUSION TECHNTQ LLP, Rep. by its partner, tvtadhu Sudhan Loya, S/o. Venu Gopal Loya, Aged about 38 years, Occ, Business, R/o. 8-13-57/C. Raghavendra Nagar Colony, Opp. NpA, Shivrampaily Road, RR District.
2. KOUSHAL AGRO PLAST, Proprietorship firm; rep. by its proprietor, Smt Kaushalya Bai Loya, W/o. Late Kishanlalji Loya, Aged about 70 yrs, Occ, Business, Rl/o. C/o PIot No. 146, Road No.25, lndustrial park, Kattedan, RR
Districts.
...PETITIONERS
AND
'1 . The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, ENERGy, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad.
2. T.G. Southern Power Distribution Company Limited, rep. by its Managing Director, Having office at Mint Compound. Hyderabad.
3. Asst. Divisional Engineer, Operation, Gaganpahad, TGSPDCL, RR District.
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to pass an order, direction, or writ, particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus, declaring Lr.No.ADE/OP/GAGANPAHADtD.No.B,t2tZ6-21, dated 16.9.2026, issued by the respondent No.3, under Clause 3.5.3 of General Terms of conditions and supply of rG.s.P.D.c.L. calling upon the petitioners to furnish single application for one connection alleging multiple locations in single premises belonging to same group/family/firm/company, as highly illegal, arbitrary and against the facts and in vioration of principres of naturar justice and condition 3.5.1 of G T C S and u nconstitutionar. consequenfly, this Hon'bre court may be preased direct the respondents 2 and 3 not to interfere with the suppry of power to the petitioner establishments, without due process of law.
t.A. NO: 10F 2026
Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to pass an Interim Direction thereby suspENDrNG the operation of the impugned retter vide Lr.
No.ADE/OP/GAGANPAHAD/D.No.B1Zl26_27, dated 16.9.2026, issued by the respondent No. 3, under crause 3.5.3 0f Generar rerms of conditions and Suppry of TG.S.P.D.C.L., pending disposal of the writ petition.
Counsel for the petitioner: SRt N.M.ANAND MOHAN MURTHY
Counsel for the Respondent No.1: Gp FOR ENERGy Counsel forthe Respondent No.2 & 3: SRI N.SREEDHAR REDDY, SC FOR TGSPDCL
The Court made the foltowing: ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
WRIT PETITION No.3466O of 2026
CNR No. FIBHCO 7O7 02552026
Dated: L2.LO.2O26
Between:
M/s.Vishal Extrusion Techniq LLP,
Rep. b.r its Partner and another.
Petitioners
AND
The Strrte of Telangala,
Rep. bf its Prl.Secretary,
Energr Department,
Secretz-,riat Buildings, Hyderabad and others Respondents
ORDER:
This Writ Pctition is fited challenging the letter issued by respondcnt No.3 dated 16.09.2026 under Clause 3.5.3 of GTCS calling upon the petitioners to furnish single application for one connection alleging multiple locations in single premises belonging to same family and also direct respondent Nos.2 and 3 not t() interferc rvith the supply of power to the petitioner.
Page 1 of 3
2. Heard Sri N.M.Anand Mohan Murthy, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.N.Sreedhar Reddy, learned standing counsel for TGSPDCL appearing on behalf of respondent Nos.2 and 3. Perused the record.
3. The facts of the case as stated are that petitioner No.1 is a registered partnership firm involved in the business of manufacturing Multilayer Cross Lamination Tarpolene and the material used in the finished goods is virgin plastic. Whereas, petitioner No.2 is a proprietorship firm invoived in the business of manufacturing Polythene Sheet and the same was established in the year 2003. It is submitted that there are two different entrances for both the firms and both the firms are different from each other. The main grievance of the petitioners is that the respondent authorities have issued the present impugned proceedings under the wrong presumption that both the firms run by the petitioners are in the same compound and are invoh,'ed in the same business and have to giv.: a common application for a single electricity supply. It is further submitted that if the impugned proceedings are implemented the existing tran sformer.s u.il1 be demolished and fresh connections has to be obtained and both the petitioners have to face severe hardship. Questioning the same, the present writ petition is filed. 4 . Mr. N. Sreedhar Reddy, learned standing counsel for TGSPDCL submits that respondent authorities have rightly passed the impugned order and the petitioners firms falls under Clause 3.5.3 of GTCS and accordingly prayed to dismiss the wnt petition as not maintainable.
5. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstalces of the case, this writ petition is disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to respond to the impugned proceedings dated 16.09.2026 within a period of 15 days by filing an appropriate application before the respondent authorities and thereafter, respondent a.uthorities shall dispose of the same in accordance to 1au, within a period of 30 days thereafter. In the meantime, the respondent authorities sha11 not take any coercive steps against the petitioners. No order as to costs
6. Srith the above directions, this writ petition is disposed of.
Page 2 of 3
Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed SD/. C.DEEPIKA ASSISTANT REGIST R //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER 1, The Pdncipal Secretary, Energy, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad, State of Telangana.
2. The Managing Director, T.G. Southern Power Distribution Company Limited' Having office at Mint Compound. Hyderabad
3. The Asst. Divisional Engineer, Operation, Gaganpahad, TGSPDCL, R R. District.
4. One CC to SRI N.M.ANAND MOHAN MURTHY, Advocate IOPUCI 5 One CC to SRI N.SREEDHAR REDDY, SC FOR TGSPDCL IOPUC]
6. Two CCs to GP FOR ENERGY, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT]
7. Two CD Copies tu;. To, BSR AD
CC TODAY HIGH COURT DATED: 1211012026 1^i E or ; + -rtt$"r*'t t-
ORDER
WP.No.34660 of 2026 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION, WITHOUT COSTS ,c (<| . ) U s" fl ,t)' 0r C: \) I \t
\t p )
Page 3 of 3
Loading citations and judicial treatment…