Telangana High Court
WP/33163/2026 of Smt.K.Swaroopa Vs The State of Telangana on 12 October 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TANGIRALA MADHAVI DEVI WRIT PETITION NO: 33163 OF 2026 Between: 1. Smt. K. Swaroopa, Wo. Late K. Mohan Reddy,
[ 321e ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF OCTOBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TANGIRALA MADHAVI DEVI
WRIT PETITION NO: 33163 OF 2026
Between:
1. Smt. K. Swaroopa, Wo. Late K. Mohan Reddy, Aged about 50 years, Occ: Tailor R/o.H.No.64-109, Nageshwara Ward, Tandur, Vikarabad District, T.G.
2. K.Amulya, D/o.Late K.Mohan Reddy Aged about 30 years, Occ: Agriculture R/o.H.No.64-109, Nageshwara Ward, Tandur, Vikarabad Diskict, T.G.
...PETITIONERS
AND
1. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department Secretariat, Hyderabad.
2. The Director General of Police, Government of Telangana, Lakdikapool, Hyderaoad.
3. The Superintendent of Police, Vikarabad District at Vikarabad.
4. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Parigi Division, Parigi Vikarabad District.
5. The Circle lnspector of Police, Kodangal Police Station, Kodangal, Vikarabad District.
6. The Sub-lnspector of Police, Dowlathabad Police Station, Dowlathabad, Vikarabad District.
7. K.Mahipal Reddy, S/o.Late K.Malreddy Aged about 70 years, Occ: Agriculture R/o.H.No.2-54, Devarfaslawad Village, Dowlathabad Mandal, Vikarabad District, T,G.
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Nlicle 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the Respondent Nos.3 to 6 in failing to consider the representation of the petitioners dt.26.08.2026 for grant of protection to the petitioners life and liberty and to the property of the petitioneis agriculture land in Sy No.154a'1AAJ1|2 lo an extent of Ac.0.10 gts situated at Devarafaslawad Village, Dowlathabad Mandal, Vikarabad District, T.G., from the hands of the 7th Respondent and his henchmen as illegal, arbitrary, u nconstitutional and violation of Article 14,21 &
300-4 of Constitution of lndia and consequently direct the Respondent Nos.3 to 6 to forthwith consider the grant of protection to the petitioners life and liberty and to their property of agriculture land in Sy.No.154a1AN112 to an extent of Ac.0.10 gts situated at Devarafaslawad Village, Dowlathabad Mandal, Vikarabad District, T.G, from the hands of 7th respondent and his henchmen by duly considering the representation of the petitioners dt.26.08.2026.
l.A. NO: 1OF 2026
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent Nos.3 to 6 to forthwith consider the representation of the petitioners d1.26.08.2026 for grant of protection to the petitioners and to their property for an agriculture land in Sy.No.154al AA,t112 lo an extent of Ac.0.10 gts situated at Devarafaslawad Village, Dowlathabad Mandal, Vikarabad District, from the hands of 7th respondent and his henchmen in the interest of justice, pending disposal of the above writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI C. HARI PREETH
Counsel forthe Respondent No.1 to 6: SRI B. SRIDHAR, ASST. cP FOR HOME
Counsel for the Respondent No.7: - - - - The Court made the following: ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT IIYDERABAD
THE HON'BLE SMT.JUSTICE TANGIRALA MADHAVI DEIT
WRIT PETITION No.33163 of 2026
(CNR No. HBHC01068ILE2026)
DATE:12.10.2026
Between:
Smt. K.Swaroopa and another
Petitioners
AND
The State ofTelangana and others
Respondents
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
:: ORDER::
Alleging that the respondent police have not acted upon the representation of the petitioners dated 26.08.2026 and have not provided protection to the petitioners life and liberty or to the petitioners agricultural land situated in Sy.No.l54alANll2 to an extent of Ac.0.10 guntas situated at Devarafaslawad Village, Dowlathabad Mandal, Vikarabad District, this writ petition has been filed.
2. Heard Sri C.Hari Preeth, leamed counsel for the petitioner and Sri B.Sridhar, leamed Assistant Govemment Pleader for Home, appearing for respondents No.1 to 6.
TMD,] wP 33763 2A25
3. The leamed counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are the owners of the subject land and that the unofficial respondent has been continuously interfering with their possession of the subject land and is threatening the petitioners. Therefore, the petitioner lodged a complaint on 26.08.2026, and as no action was taker by the police, this writ petition has been filed
4. The leamed Assistant Govemment Pleader for Home, on written instnLctions, submitted that, upon receipt of the complaint dated 26.08.2026, a preliminary enquiry was conducted and it was found that there is a civil dispute between the petitioners and the unofficial respondent in O.S. No.104 of 2024 on the file of Junior Civil Judge, Kodangal. Therefore, the complaint was closed as civil in nature on 01.09.2026, and the same was communicated to the petitioners through the petition management system. Hence, there is no inaction on the part of the respondents.
5. Having regard to the rival contentions and the material on record, this Court f,rnds that the petitioners claim to be the owner of the subject property and that the unofficial respondent has approached the civil Court by filing O.S. No.104 of 2024.It is stated that there is no order in TMD,J wP_33153_2026 favour of the plaintiff in the said suit. However, if the petitioners apprehend any threat to their lives, they may call the police, and upon receipt of such a call, the respondent police shall consider the same and provide appropriate assistance. The petitioners are also granted liberty to avail appropriate remedy against the closure of the complaint.
6. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous applications, if any, pending sha11 stand closed. SD/. P.C. SULEKHA DEVI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER
1. The Principal Secretary Home Department The State of Telangana, Secretariat, Hyderabad.
2. The Director General of Police, Government of Telangana Lakdikapool, Hyderaoad.
3. The Superintendent of Police, Vikarabad District at Vikarabad.
4. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Parigi Division, Parigi Vikarabad District.
5. The Circle lnspector of Police, Kodangal Police Star-ion Kodangal, Vikarabad District.
6. The Sub-lnspector of Police, Dowlathabad Police Station Dowlathabad, Vikarabad District.
7. One CC to SRI C. HARI PREETH, Advocate [OPUC]
8. Two CCs to GP FOR HOME, High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad [OUT]
9. Two CD Copies BN
To,
HIGH COURT DATED: 1211012026
ORDER
WP.No.33163 of 2026 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS CC TODAY J S iA r'(: Jt' :) 16 ocT 2s2$ q a or) t z-!^