Telangana High Court
CRLP/16922/2026 of ARBAZ KHAN Vs The State of Telangana, on 12 October 2026
THE STATE OF TELANGANA MAIN CASE: Crl.P.No.16922 of 2026 PROCEEDING SHEET Sl. No. DATE ORDER OFFICE NOTE 12.10.2026 BRMR, J Counsel for the petitioner : Sri G. Surender. Counsel for the respondent: E. Ganesh, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor. 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
MAIN CASE: Crl.P.No.16922 of 2026
PROCEEDING SHEET
Sl.
No.
DATE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
OFFICE NOTE
12.10.2026
BRMR, J
Counsel for the petitioner : Sri G. Surender. Counsel for the respondent: E. Ganesh, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor.
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner-A2 is enlarged on bail in Crl.M.P.No. 978 of 2026 in Crime No. 423 of 2026 of Moinabad Police Station, vide order dated 08.10.2026 subject to certain conditions. The petitioner-A2 was directed to execute a personal bond for a sum of Rs.20,000/- with two sureties for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court. Petitioner is a labourer and is unable to produce the sureties as ordered by the learned Sessions Court, prayed to reduce the surety amount.
2. The petitioner-A2 is facing prosecution in Crime No. 423 of 2026 of Moinabad Police Station for the offences punishable under Sections 137(2) and 65(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, Section 5(l) read with Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, and Section 3(2)(va) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.
3. Petitioner has filed Crl.M.P. No. 978 of 2026 before the learned Sessions Court, seeking regular bail, and the same was allowed vide order dated 08.10.2026 subject to the condition that the petitioner-A2 shall execute a personal bond for a sum of Rs.20,000/- with two sureties for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court.
4. Material placed before this Court goes to shows that the petitioner is working as a labourer. This Court is of the view that if the petitioner is directed to execute a personal bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties for a like sum each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court will meet the ends of Justice. The other conditions imposed by the learned Sessions Court shall remain unaltered.
5. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is allowed.
__________ BRMR, J
pl