WP/34321/2026 of Mulla Abdul Kareem Vs The State of Telangana on 12 October 2026

1. Mulla Abdul Kareem, S/o. Mulla Mohammed Ghouse, Age 77 Years, Occ Retired Employee, Fl/o. Plot No. 58A, |V.L.A. Colony, Road No. 12, Baniara Hills, Hyderabad.

2. Abdul Quddus Mulla, S/o. Mulla Abdul Kareem, Age 50 Years, Occ Engineer' Ft/o. H. No. 17-88, Vaddegiri, Kurnool District, now in 6480' Century Drive, San Jose, California, U.S.A.-95129, Represented by his G.P A. Holder, M. Abdul Aleem S/o. Abdul Kareem, Age 48 Years, Occ Engineer, RJo. Plot No. 58A, M.L.A. Colony, Road No. 12,Baniarc Hills, Hyderabad.

3. Abdul Aleem Mulla, S/o. Mulla Abdul Kareem, Age 48 Years, Occ Engineer, Fl/o. Plot No. 58A, M.L.A. Colony, Road No. 12,Baniara Hills, Hyderabad.

4. Anees Fathima Begum, W/o. Riyaz Pasha Shaik, Age 44 Years, Occ Housewife, Fl/o. H. No. 6-3-11771713, Hussainnagar Colony, Kundanbagh, Begumpet, Hyderabad. ...PETITIONERS AND 'l . The State of Telangana, represented by its Principal Secretary to the Municipal Administration and Urban Development Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad.

2. The Cyberabad Municipal Corporation, represented by its Commissioner, NISE, lzzathnagar, Hyderabad, Kothaguda, Telangana-500084.

3. The Zonal Commissioner, Serilingampally Zone, Cyberabad Municipal Corporation, HCU Bus Depot Rd, Serilingampalle (M), Hyderabad, Telangana-500019.

4. The Deputy Commissioner, Circle - 20, Cyberabad Municipal Corporation, HCU Bus Depot Rd, Serilingampalle (M), Hyderabad, Telangana-SOOO19.

5. The Chief City Planner, Serilingampally Zone, Cyberabad Municipal Corporation, HCU Bus Depot Rd, Serilingampalle (M), Hyderabad'

6. The Hyderabad tr4etropolitan Development Authority, Havlng its Office at Swarna Jayanthi Complex, Sanjeeva Reddy Nagar Road, Srinivasa Nagar, Ameerpet, Hyderabad, Represented by its Commissioner. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of trrrit of mandamus or any other appropriate writ declaring the action of the respondent authorities in earmarking part of the land of the petitioners i.e., in regarding with plot Nos. 109 and 92, effecting 40' Feet width and 140 length and in regarding with plot Nos. 96 and 105, effecting 5'width and length 106'.3 situated in Sy. No. 100, in Layout of Mythri Cooperative Housing Society, subsequently the locality is named as Sai Sri Colony, Kondapur, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, without following due process of Law particularly without initiating land acquisition proceedings and without paying any compensation to us or in the alternate without allotting extent of the land having er;ual value, considering the representations of the petitioners dated 14-08- 2026, 17-08-2026 and 19-08-2026, is nothing but arbitrary, illegal, null and void and violative cf principles of natural justice and also violative of Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of lndia. particularly by following the procedure ccntemplated under The Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in [-and Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. Consequently direct the respondent authoritiers to consider the representations of the petitioners, thereby not to lay any such CC Road from any part of the petitioners plots of land stated above, unless the respondent authorities follow the due process of Law. l.A. NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affrdavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent authorities not to take up any work of laying of CC Road from any part of the petitioners plot of land admeasuring 350.00 Sq. Yds in Plot No. 109 and also plot of land admeasuring 350.00 Sq. Yds in plot No.96, the plot of land admeasuring 350.00 Sq. Yds in Plot No. 105, the plot of land admeasuring 350 00 Sq. Yds in Plot No. 92, situated in Sy. No. '1 00, situated in Sy. No. 100, in Layout of Mythri cooperative Housing society, subsequently the locality is named as sai sri colony, Kondapur, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, unless the respondent authorities follow due process of Law. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. K. VENUMADHAV Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR MCPL ADMN URBAN DEV Counsel forthe Respondents No.2 To 5: SRI K. RAVI MAHENDER' SC FOR MUNICIPAL CORPORATION Counsel for the Respondent No.6 : SRI V. NARSIMHA GOUD, SC FOR HMDA The Gourt made the following: ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE B. VIJAYSEN REDDY WRIT PETITION No.34321 OF 2026 CNR.No.HBHC01 0689572026 Date:12.10.2026 Between: Mulla Abdul Kareem and others Petitioners. AND The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary to the Municipal Administration and Urban Development Department, Secretariat Bu ildings, Hyderabad, and others. .. Respondents ORDER:(ORAL) Heard Mr. K. Venumadhav, learned counsel for the petitioners; Mr. K. Ravi Mahender, learned Standing Counsel for Cyberabad lVunicipal Corporation (CMC), appearing for respondent Nos.2 to 5; and Mr. V. Narasimha Goud, learned Standing Counsel for Hyderabad Metropolitan Development Authority (HMDA), appearing for respondent No.6; and perused the material available on record.

2. Learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondent Nos.2 to 5 sought time to get instructions

3. However, as seen from the documents marked as Exs.p3 to P7 (gift settlement deed/sale deeds), the petitioners acquired ownership rights over the subject property i.e., plot Nos.92, 96, i05 and 1 09 situated in Survey No.1 00 of Kondapur Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, on the strength of the said documents. The said plots form part of the Layout of Mythri Cooperative Housing Society, which was subsequenfly renamed as Sai Sri Colony Layout. According to the learned counsel for the petitioners, the subject plots form part of the approved draft layout in file bearing No.290/l\4PU/BDN1982 sanctioned by the then Bhagyanagar Development Authority. lt is further submitted that the HMDA, vlde letter dated 25.02.2022 (Ex.P9), furnished a certified copy of the said layout.

4. Prima facie, it appears that the petitioners are in possession and enjoyment ofthe subject property.

5. As innocuous relief is sought in this writ petition, this Court is of the view that there is no necessity for the respondents to file their counter affidavit.

6. At this stage, learned Standing Counsel for respondent Nos.2 to 5 submitted that due process of law would be followed, if the subject

To, property or any portion thereof is required for the purpose of road widening.

7. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of, directing respondent No.2 not to interfere with the petitioners' possession and enjoyment over the subject property without following due process of law. lt is, however, made clear that the observations made herein shall not be construed as recognizing or adjudication of the petitioners' rlghts over the subject property, and the findings recorded are only prima facie in nature and confined to the disposal of the present writ petition. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous applications, if any, pending in this writ petition stand closed SD/./ A.H.S.GOWRI SHANKAR ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER

1. The Principal Secretary to the tt/unicipal Administration and Urban Development Department, State of Telangana, Secretariat Buildings, Hyd erabad.

2. The Commissioner, Cyberabad Municipal Corporation, NISE, lzzathnagar' Fyderabad, Kothaguda, Telangana-500084'

3. The Zonal Commissioner, Serilingampally Zone, Cyberabad Municipal Corporation, HCU Bus Depot Rd, Serilingampalle (M), Hyderabad,

4. The Deputy Commissioner, Circle - 20, Cyberabad lvlunicipal Corporation, HCU Bus Depot Rd, Serilingampalle (M), Hyderabad, Telangana-500019

5. The Chief City Planner, Serilingampally Zone, Cyberabad Municipal Corporation, HCU Bus Depot Rd, Serilingampalle (l\n)' Hyderabad, Telangana-50001 9.

o. The Commissioner, Hyderabad Metropolitan Development Authority, Having its Office at Swarna Jayanthi Complex, Sanjeeva Reddy Nagar Road, Srinivasa Nagar, Ameerpet, Hyderabad.

7. One CC to SRl. K VENUMADHAV, Advocate IOPUCI

8. Two CCs to GP FOR MCPL ADMN URBAN DEV, High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad [OUT]

9. One CC to SRI K. RAVI MAHENDER, SC FOR MUNICIPAL CORPORATION loPUCl '10. One CC to SRI V. NARSIMHA GOUD, SC FOR HMDA [OPUC] I 1 . Two CD Copies DAN PB W

HIGH COURT DATED: 1211012026

ORDER

WP.No.34321 of 2026 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS CC TODAY 1Y\e STATE o q o !) 14 ocT 2020 .,,: I oe-" ,.A1r-!' Q,,r iD ,r/$ 1b

I