WP/34252/2026 of Ahmed Bin Awad, Vs The State of Telangana, on 9 October 2026

[ 31831

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

FRIDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF OCTOBER

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENW SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.VIJAYSEN REDDY

WRIT PETITION NO: 34252 OF 2026

Between:

1. Ahmed Bin Awad, S/o. Late Awad Bin Ahmed, aged about 50 years, Occ.

Service at Dubai, UAE, R/o. H.No.3-5-786/4, King Kothi, Hyderabad.

2. Ahmed Bin Hamed, S/o. Mr. Hamed Bin Abdullah, aged about 38 years, Occ.

Service at Dubai, UAE, Rl/o. H.No.18-10-206/D, Barkas, Chandrayangutta, Hyderabad.

Both represented by their GPA Holder Mr. Hasan Bin Awaz Bamigdad, S/o.

Awaz Bin Ahmed Bamigdad, aged about 75 years, Occ. Business, R/o.

H.No.4-129/1 , Errakunta, Bandlaguda, Hyderabad, vide registered GPA

document No.1 412025 daled 17 -0 1 -2025.

...PETITIONERS

AND

1. The State of Telangana, represented by its Principal Secretary Municipal Administration and Urban Development Department, Hyderabad.

2. The Commissioner, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Tank Bund Road, Hyderabad.

3. The Zonal Commissioner, Khairtabad Zone, GHMC, Hyderabad.

4. The Deputy Commissioner, Circle No.35, GHMC, Khairtabad, Hyderabad.

5. The Assistant City Planner, Circle No.35, GHMC, Khairtabad, Hyderabad.

6. Mr. Mohammad Arif, S/o. Mohammed Salar, aged about 38 years, Occ.

Business, R/o. H.No.3-5-7821101611 , Parda Gate, King Kothi, Hyderabad.

...RESPONDENTS

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to pass an order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ or direction, holding that the inaction of Respondent Nos.2 to 4 in not taking any positive action on the representation dated 23-05-2026 filed by the Petitioners and not removing and demolishing the illegal construction of Respondent No.5 in the premises bearing No.3-5 -7821101611 , King Kothi, Hyderabad, is illegal, arbitrary, malicious, politically motivated, .against the provisions of the GHMC Act and TS bPASS Ac|,2020, besides abuse of the powers vested in the authority and against the principles of natural justice and fair play, and also violative of Articles 14, 19,21 and 3004 of the Constitution of lndia, and consequently direct Respondents No.2 to 4 to take immediate action by removing and demolishing the illegal and unauthorized construction of Respondent No.5 in the premises bearing No.3-5 -7821101611 , King Kothi, Hyderabad, by considering the complainUrepresentation dated 23-05-2026

LA. NO: 1OF 2026

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents demolish the construction in the premises bearing No.3-5-78211 0/6/1 , King Kothi, Hyderabad, during the pendency of the Writ Petition, Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI MD.AJMAL AHMED

Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR MCPL ADMN & URBAN DEV

Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 to 5: SRI MIDDE ARUN KUMAR, SC FOR GHMC

The Court made the following: ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE B. VIJAYSEN REDDY

WRIT PETITION No.342 520F 2026

CNR.No.HBH

010705662026

Date:09.10.2026

Between:

Ahmed Bin Awad and others

AND

Petitioners.

The State of Telangana,

Rep. by its Principal Secretary,

It/unicipal Administration and

Urban Development Department,

Hyderabad, and others.

.. Respondents

ORDER:(ORAL)

Heard Mr. Md. Ajmal Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioners; and lVr. M. Arun Kumar, learned Standing Counsel for Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation (GHMC), appearing for respondent Nos.2 to 5; and perused the material available on record

2. Learned Standing Counsel appearing for GHIt/C submitted that the petitioners' complainUrepresentation daled 23.05.2026, alleging unauthorised construction by respondent No.6 in the premises bearing No.3-5-782l'1 01611, King Kothi, Hyderabad, would be duly considered in accordance with law

To,

3. ln view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of, directing respondent No.4 - Deputy Commissioner, GHtvlC, Circle No.35, Khairtabad, Hyderabad, to consider the petitioners'

conrplainVrepresentation dated 23.05.2026, alleging unauthorised construction by respondent No.6 in the premises bearing No.3-5- 782t101611, King Kothi, Hyderabad, and pass orders, in accordance with law, within a period of four (04) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, by issuing notice to the petitioner and respondent No.6 and by affording an opportunity of hearing to them. As this order is passed without entering into the merits of the case, notice to respondent No.6 is dispensed with. However, if respondent No.6 is in any'/vay aggrieved by this order, he is at liberty to approach this Court seeking modification of thls order. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous applications, if ,any, pending in this writ petition stand closed.

SD/. T. SRINIVASA REDDY

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

//TRUE COPY//

SECTION OFFICER

1. The Principal Secretary, Municipal Administration and Urban Development Department, Hyderabad, State of Telangana.

2. The Commissioner, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Tank Bund Road, Hyderabad.

3. The Zonal Commissioner, Khairtabad Zone, GHMC, Hyderabad.

4. The Deputy Commissioner, Circle No.35, GHMC, Khairtabad, Hyderabad.

5, The Assistant City Planner, Circle No.35, GHMC, Khairtabad, Hyderabad.

6. One CC to SRI MD.AJMAL AHMED, Advocate [OPUCI

7. One CC to SRI MIDDE ARUN KUMAR, SC FOR GHMC [OPUC]

8. Two CCs to GP FOR MCPL ADMN & URBAN DEV, High Court for the State ofTelangana, at HYderabad [OUT]

9. Two CD CoPies

BSR M-

HIGH COURT

DATED: 0911012026