Telangana High Court
WP/34419/2026 of Smt. Dyagara Lakshmi, Vs The State of Telangana, on 9 October 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.VIJAYSEN REDDY WRIT PETITION NO: 34419 OF 2026 Between: Smt. Dyagara Lakshmi, Wo. Late Dyagara Narsing Rao,
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF OCTOBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.VIJAYSEN REDDY
WRIT PETITION NO: 34419 OF 2026
Between:
Smt. Dyagara Lakshmi, Wo. Late Dyagara Narsing Rao, Aged about 48 years, Occ. Household, H.No.1l-68, Sai Township, Opp Water Tank, Badangpet, Saroornagar, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana.
...PETITIONER
AND
'l . The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Municipal Administration and Urban Development Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.
2. The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Rep. by its Commissioner, Hyderabad.
3. The Deputy Commissioner, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Circle- 16, Badangpet, Shamshabad Zone, Hyderabad.
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in proceeding to implement the Speaking Order Lr.No.G1 lTPSl151912026 dated 22.09.2026, without first considering the petitioner's application dated 30.09.2026 submitted under Sections 455-A and 455-AA of the GHMC Act, 1955, as arbitrary, illegal, unreasonable and contrary to principles of natural justice and consequently direct the 3rd respondent to receive and consider the petitioner's application dated 30.09.2026
under Sections 455-4 and 455-AA of the GHMC Act, 1955 consider the said application along with the BRS/regularisation application, Building Permit No 695/1 1
dated 08.03.2011, sanctioned plan, payment particulars, earlier explanation, hearing proceedings and all other relevant documents afford the petitioner a reasonable opportunity of personal hearing pass an appropriate reasoned and speaking order within a time-bound period as may be fixed by this Hon'ble Court and consequently, defer the implementation of the demolition/removal direction contained in the Speaking Order dated 22 09.2026 until the petitioner's application under Sections 455-,4 and 455-AA is considered and finally disposed.
l.A. NO: 1OF 2026
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to maintain status quo with regard to the physical features and possession of H.No.1'1-68, Sai Township, Badangpet, and consequently suspend/defer the operation and implementation of the Speaking Order Lr.No.Gl,TPS/1519t2026 daled 22.09.2026 insofar as it directs demolition/removal of the existing construction, pending consideration and disposal of the petitioner's application dated 30.09.2026 under Sections 455-A and 455-AA of the GHM.0 Act, 1955, and further direct both the petitioner and the private respondent to maintain status quo and not to alter, demolish, add to or interfere with the existing physical features of the subject property, pending disposal of the writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI L.RAM SINGH FOR SRI M.VENKATESWARLU
Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR MCPL ADMN & URBAN DEV
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2&3: SRI M.KRISHNA, SC FOR GHMC
The Court made the following: ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
THE HON'BLE SR,I JUSTICE B. VIJAYSEN REDDY
WRIT PETITION No.34419 of 2O26
(CNR No.HBHCO10708862026)
Dated: 09.1O.2026
Between
Smt. Dyagara Lakshmi
...PETITIONER
And
The State of Telangana,
Rep. by its Principal Secretary,
Municipal Administration and
Urban Development Department,
Secretariat, Hyderabad and others
...RESPONDENTS
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Heard Mr. L. Ram Singh, learned counsel, appearing for Mr. M. Venkateshwarlu, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. M. Krishna, learned standing counsel for respondents No.2 and
3.
2. Learned standing counsel for GHMC submitted that this Court disposed of WP.No.18424 of 2026 by order dated 17.06.2026 imposing costs on the petitioner therein and prayed to impose reasonable costs on the petitioner herein. Further, respondent No.2 would consider the regularization application of the petitioner dated 30.09.2026 and pass orders in accordance with law.
3. Recording the aforesaid submission of the learned standing counsel, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.2 to consider the regularization application dated 30.09.2026 of the petitioner submitted under Sections 455-A and 455-AA of the GHMC Act seeking regularization of unauthorized one upper floor constructed above Stilt + 2 Upper Floors on property bearing H.No.11-68, Sai Township, Badangpet Village, Balapur Mandal, Hyderabad, by issuing notice and affording opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, complalnant - Jalla Madhusudhan and other interested persons and pass orders, in accordance with law, within a period of four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, subject to the condition of the petitioners depositing costs of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees one lakh onlv) to the Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Circle - 16, Badangpet, Shamshabad Zone, Hyderabad, within a period of two
(2) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of thls order.
4. Pending consideration of the regularization application dated
30. A9.2026, the impugned speaking order dated 22.09.2026 shall be kept in abeyance. The miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as costs. SD/- AHMED ABDULLA KHAN .flsci REGISTRAR //TRUE COPYII SECTION OFFICER
1. The Principal Secretary, Municipal Administration and Urban Development Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.
2. The Commissioner, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Hyderabad. To,
3. The Deputy Commissioner, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Circle- 16, Badangpet, Shamshabad Zone, Hyderabad.
4. One CC to SRI M.VENKATESWARLU, Advocate [OPUC] 5 One CC to SRI M.KRISHNA, SC FOR GHMC [OPUC]
6. Two CCs to GP FOR MCPL ADMN & URBAN DEV, High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad [OUT]
7. Two CD Copies PMK AGK @\
HIGH COURT BVR, J DATED: 0911012026
ORDER
tt CC TODAY (e oF T€( F *otss .s" + WP.No.34419 of 2026 I F( o DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS P t c + H S @ cro