Telangana High Court
WP/33943/2026 of Shaikh Abdul Jafar Abdul Rehman Habib Vs The State of Telangana on 8 October 2026
COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (SPecial Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TANGIRALA MADHAVI DEVI WRIT PETITION NO: 33943 oF 2026 [ 321e ] ...PETITIONER Between:
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
(SPecial Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF OCTOBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TANGIRALA MADHAVI DEVI
WRIT PETITION NO: 33943 oF 2026
[ 321e ]
...PETITIONER
Between:
ShaikhAbdulJafarAbdulRehmanHabib,s/oAbdulRehmanHabib,Aged iiiui zz years, Occ. Student , Rto. 2-4-651121 , Street.No 5' Fort View Colony'
Upp"rp"ffir, Ranjendranagar, Rangareddy, Telangana, 500030.
AND
'1 . The State of Telangana, Rep by its Principal Secretary Home Department Secretariat, HYderabad.
Z. ih" Cor.issioner of Police, Hyderabad Police Commissionerate' Banjara Hills, Hyderabad
3. The Station House Officer, PS Habeeb Nagar, Hyderabad.
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstancesstatedintheaffidavitfiledtherewith,theHighCourtmaybepleased to issue a writ, direction, order or orders more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the Respondents No' 3 in harassing the PetitionerbycallingdirectlyfromosTl266o4S4andcompellingthePetitionerto come to Police Station without issuing any Notice's and without following the due processoflaw,whichisillegal,arbitrary,motivated,malicious,unconstitutional, againsttheprlnciplesofnaturaljusticeandfairplayandviolativeofArticlesl4,l9, and2loltheConstitutionoflndiaandconsequentlymaybepleasedtodirectthe Respondent3thatnottotakeanycoerciveStepsagainstthepetitionerandifthere anyFlRregisteredagainstthepetitionerthenmayfollowthedueprocedureoflaw.
LA. NO: 1OF 2026
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent 3 that not to take any coercive steps against the petitioner and if there any FIR registered against the petitioner then may follow the due procedure of law.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SK.ASHRAF
Counsel for the Respondents: SRI D.PRADEEP, AGP FOR HOME
The Court made the following: ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
THE I{ONOURABLE SMT.JUSTICE TANGIRALA MADHAVI
DEVI
WRIT PETITION No. 33943 oI2O26
(CNR No. HBHC0 I 0 696402026)
DATE:08.10.2026
Between:
Shaikh Abdut Jafal Abdul Rehman Habib
...Petitioner
AND
lhe State of Telangana and 2 others
. . . Respondents
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
This Writ Petition is filed alleging that respondent No.3 is sumuroning the petitioner to the police station and harassing him rvithor,rt issuing any notice or following due process of law.
2. Hcald learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri D.Pradeep, lealned Assistar-rt Government Pleader tbr Home appearing tbr respondents No.I to 3.
3. Learned Assistant Govemment Pleader for Home has furnished a copy of the ra,ritten instructions received by him and I \ll] r U'P Ii9{-r li)lr; submitted that one Mr. Mohd. Akrarn lodsed corlPlaint lga inst a the petitioner on 28.09.2026, pursuant to rvhich an entr),rvas ntade in lhe Gr-neral l)iary on the sarne day. lt is submirted tlut, duling the course of the enquiry, the petitioner was called to rhe policc station, but he did not appear and instead llled W P No 33281 ol' 2026. This Court had disposed of the said nrit petition. r,lle order dated 0l .10.2026, directing the petitioner to appear befbre respondent No.3. It is further submitted that the petitioner tailecl to apllear and cooperate with the enquiry. Thercaftcr., upon preliminarv tnquirt,. (lrirne No.l48 of 2026 rvas rc.qister,:d agirinst the petitione-r on 03. 10.2026 lbr the ol'fences ptrnishable under Sections 329(3) and 351(2) ofthe Bharatiya Nyaya Sanirita. 2023. and the investigation is in progress. It is also statetl that the lnvestigating Otficer attempted to serve a noticc urrdi:r. Seclior.t ll-s(3) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Sur.aksha Sanhita. on the petitioner, but the petitioner did not cooperare.
4. In vie"r' of the registration of the afbresaid crirne. rhe petitioner is clirected 1tl appear betbr.c lesponcleirt No. j on 20:l 10.2026, whereupou the respoudent police slrall se t-r e noticc on E To PSK. TMD.J wP 339.13 102/r hirn under Section 35(3) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, and proceed strictly in accordance with law
5. With the above observations and directions, this Writ Petition is disposed of . No order as to costs. N,liscellarreous applications, if any, pending shall stand closed l //TRUE COPY// SD/- P. PRAMOD NAIK ASSISTANT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER l.ThePrincipalsecretaryHomeDepartmentSecretariat'Hyderabad'Stateof Telangana.
2. Th; iommissioner of police, Hyderabad police commissionerate, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad.
a. tne'stition House Officer, PS Habeeb Nagar, Hyderabad'
4. One CC to SRI SK.ASHRAF, Advocate [OPUC]
s. i*o ccs to cp FoR HOME, High court for the state of Telangana, at Hyderabad. [OUT]
6. Two CD CoPies
I CC TODAY HIGH COURT DATED: 0811012026
ORDER
WP.No.33943 of 2026 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS. 1H E SiA ?t: s o J 0 g rlti 2025 a9 c\ e t\ f