Telangana High Court
WP/33597/2026 of Mrs. Zehra Bee Vs The State of Telangana on 8 October 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TANGIRALA MADHAVI DEVI WRIT PETITIO N NO: 33597 OF 2026 Between: Mrs. Zehra Bee, Wo. Late Mohammed Khaja
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF OCTOBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TANGIRALA MADHAVI DEVI
WRIT PETITIO N NO: 33597 OF 2026
Between:
Mrs. Zehra Bee, Wo. Late Mohammed Khaja Miya, aged about 61 years, Occ'
House Hold, R/o. H.No. 2-541D, f alti Khana, Tatti Annaram, Mandal Abdullapurmet, District Ranga Reddy, T6langana.
...'ET'T'ONER
AND
'1 . The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.
2. The Commissioner of Police, Rachakonda Commissionerate.
3. The Station House Officer, Nagole Police Station, Ranga Reddy District'
4. Syed Khaleel, S/o. not known, Aged about Major, years, Occ . Business, R/o.
H.No.1-177-, Chand Khan Guda, Japal Manchal, R.R.District.
5. Mrs Nazia Begum, Wo. Syed Khaleel Aged about 28 years, Occ. Housewife, R/o. H.No.'l-177-, Chand Khan Guda, Japal Manchal, R.R.District.
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents Police authorities herein more particularly the Respondents No.3 in illegally trying to dispossess the petitioner from subject matter property Residential House bearing No.2-54lD, admeasuring 180 Sq. Yards, equivalent to 't 50.49 Sq. Mtrs, having plinth area of 100 Sq. Ft. of A.C.C. Roof , situated at Thattiannaram Village (Old Village), under Pedda Amberpet Nagar Panchayat, Abdullapurmet Revenue Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State, despite !!!,-F
!r!EE q!{"!!.-?
F.-. ---.
pending of Ad-lnterim rnjunction in a competent forum, in an arbitrary, ilegar and high handed manner. Further the action of the respondents herein particurarry respondent No. 3 in interfering into the petitioner's peacefur possession over the subject property is challenged as being bad, arbitrary, i[egar and contrary to the principres of naturar justice and violative of Articres 14, i9 (1) (g) and 21 of the constitution of rndia, in the interest of justice.
l.A. NO:1 oF 2026
Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to direct the Respondents herein, more particurarry respondent No.3 not to interfere with the possession of the petitioner over the property i.e., Residentiar House bearing No_ 2-54 /
D, admeasuring 180 Sq. yards, equivalent to 150.49 Sq. Mtrs, having plinth area of 100
sq' Ft. of A C.c Rt.of, situated at rhattiannaram Viilage (ord \riilage), under pedda Amberpet Nagar Panchayat, Abdulapurmet Revenue Mandar, Flanga Reddy District, Telangana state, pending disposar of the main Writ petition, in the interest of justice.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI G.SHIVA KUMAR
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 TO 3: SRt D.PRADEEP, AGp FOR HOME
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.4 & S: -
The Court made the following: ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TANGIRALA MADHAVI DEVI
WRJT PETITION No. 33597 ot2O26
CNRNo. HBHCO1 0688972026
DATE:08.1 0.2026
Between:
Mrs.Zehra Bee
...Petitioner
AND
The State of Telangana and Four Others.
.. .Respondents
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Alleging that respondent No.3 is illegally trying to dispossess the petitioner from the subject property, residential house bearing No.2-54lD, admeasuring 180 Sq.Yards., equivalent to 150.49 Sq.Mtrs., having a plinth area of 100 Sq.Ft., of A.C.C.Roof, situated at Thattiannaram Village (Old Village), under Pedda Amberpet Nagar panchayat, Abdullapurmet Revenue Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana State and that in spite ofpetitioner possessing ad-interim injunction order from the competent forum, this writ petition is fited.
2. This Court, vide interim order dated 06.10.2026 had directed the respondent police not to interfere in the civil dispute between the petitioner and respondents No.4 and 5.
fMo) w,P,No r:t597 o1 2026
3. Mr.D.Pradeep, the leamed Assistant Govemment Pleader for Home, on written instructions submitted that on 20.08.2026 afternoon, the petitioner's son had complained to '100 dial' stating that his sister and brother-in-law have illegally occupit:d his mother's residential house and when he went along with Electricity Department officials for removing the electricity meter, he was beaten up and had requested police help and that the police had attended '100 dial' complaint and both parties were advised not to quarrel and not to create public nuisance and thereafter, the petitioner's son had given a complaint, which has been registered as a case in Crime No.52712026 for the offences under Sections 118(1),304(2),351(2),352 ofBNS, dated 20.08.2026.
4. It is further submitted that a notice under Section 35(3) of BNSS has been issued to the accused and except for tlte conduct of the investigation into the said crime, they are not interfe ring in the civil disputes. The copy of the FIR is also filed and it r,r'as pointed out that respondent No.4 is arrayed as accused in the said FIR.
5. In view of the same, the respondent polict: are directed not to interfere in the civil disputes between the petition:r and unofficial
To PSK fMo) W.P, No.jj597 ol 2026 respondents No.4 and 5 and they may, however, conduct the investigation into said FIR strictly in accordance with law. 6" Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. 7 . Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition, shall stand closed. SD/- P. PRAMOD NAIK ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER '1 . The Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad, State of Telangana.
2. The Commissioner of Police, Rachakonda Commissionerate.
3. The Station House Officer, Nagole Police Station, Ranga Reddy District.
4. One CC to SRI G.SHIVA KUMAR, Advocate [OPUC]
5. Two CCs to GP FOR HOME, High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad. [OUT]
6. Two CD Copies E:=E#;EffiE. ;;E- G
CC TODAY HIGH COURT DATED: 0811012026
ORDER
WP.No.33597 ot 2026 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS. i* '... t r, \-
l. s.l n,I€ /,! ii) l) i'1.. 0 g rtT ?H$ \,. ti' ..i:/ o .h ,;\$i