Telangana High Court

CRLP/16660/2026 of MARABOINA VAMSHI KRISHNA Vs Smt. MARABOINA BEENA on 8 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J SREENIVAS RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 16660 OF 2026 Between: MARABOINA VAI\/SHl KRISHNA, Son of l/araboina Jar Chander, Aged about 39 years,

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

THURSDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF OCTOBER

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J SREENIVAS RAO

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 16660 OF 2026

Between:

MARABOINA VAI\/SHl KRISHNA, Son of l/araboina Jar Chander, Aged about 39 years, Occupation. Unemployed, Present Resident of H.No.8-73, Vrkas Nagar Colony, Besides MYR Gardens, Nagaram, Keesara lt/andal, I\4edchal lrlalkaigiri District, Telangana State - 500083.

..Petitioner/Respondent

AND

1. Smt. MARABOINA BEENA, Wife of Vamshi Krishna [\4araboina, Aged about 37 years, Occupation. Teacher, Resident of Plot No.2B, Narmada Nilayam, Krishna Nagar, l.C.R.l.S.A.T Colony, Phase 2, Manovikas Nagar, OId Bowenpally, Secunderabad, Telangana State - 500009.

2 JATIN KRISHNA IMARABOINA, Son of Vamshi Krishna Maraboina, Aged about 12 years, Occupation. Student, Resident of Plot No.28, Narmada Nilayam, Krishna Nagar, l.C.R.l.S.A,T Colony, Phase 2, Manovikas Nagar, Old Bowenpally, Secunderabad, Telangana State - 500009.

3. NAINIKA KRISHNA IVARABOINA, Daughter of Vamshi Krishna Maraboina, Aged about 9 years, Occupation Student, Resident of Plot No.28, Narmada Nilayam, Krishna Nagar,- l.C.R.l.S.A.T Colony, Phase 2, [\/anovikas Nagar, Old Bowenpally, Secunderabad, Telangana State - 500009.

... Respondents/Petitioners

4. The State of Telangana, THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, Police Station Keesara, represented by its Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana.

...Respondent No. 4

Petition under Section 528 of ENSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to recall the Non-Bailable Warrant dated 11.08.2025, issued by the Principal Family Court, Secunderabad and thereby Quash the Docket Order dated 01.10.2026, passed by the learned Principal Family Court, Secunderabad in It/.C. No. 18 of 2022.

rE

-GI

t'

l.A. NO: 1 OF 2026

Petition under Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the ctrcumstances stated in the lt/lemorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court rray be pleased to stay the Iurther operations of the Non-Bailable Warrant dated 1'l .08.2025 issued against the Petitioner/Respondent by the Principal Family Court, Secunderabad, and subsequently direct the Respondent No.4 to not to arrest the Petitioner/Res po ndent, pending disposal of the present Criminal Petition.

This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the lrrlemorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Mekala Sai Kalyan Goud, Advocate for the Petitioner and the Mr. Jithender Rao Veeramalla, Additiona Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No 4 and of None appeared for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 3.

The Court made the following: ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

.I'HE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J.SREENIVAS RAO

CRIMINAL PETITION No.16660 of 2026

CNR.No. HBHC0I 0700512026

Date:08.10.2026

Between:

Maraboina Vamshi Krishna

...Petitioner

AND

Smt. Maraboina Beena and three others

..Respondents

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

This Criminal Petition is filed by the petitioner seeking rccall of the Non-Bailable Warrant (NBW) issued by the learned Judge, Principal Family Court, Secunderabad, on I 1.08.2025.

2. Heard Mr.Mekala Sai Kalyan Goud, learned counsel lor the petitioner and Mr.Jithender Rao Veeramalla, Ieamed Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondent No.4-State

3. Notice to respondent Nos.l to 3 is dispensed with, on thc ground that the petitioner is not seeking any rclielagainst thcm and is only seeking recall olthe NBW issued against him

4. Leamed counsel for the petitioner submitted that the leamed trial Court, on I 1.08.2025, issued a Non-Bailable Warrant (NBW)

- againsl the petitioncr..fherealier. the petitioncr filcd petirion ll& 2 a

5. l)cr torttrLt.learncd Additional Public Prosecutot- su[,nrits that o1- thc czrsc. arrd w ithout cxpressing any 'n'iew ott the subttrissions \4.P.No.323 of'1026. invoking the provisions of Section 70(2) of the Cr.P.C., seeking recall of the NBW issued against him. l{owever, without deciding the said petition. the leamed trial Court has been ad-lourning the matter from time to time. Unless this Court recalls thc said NBW. the pctitioner will be put to great hardship thc oetitioncr hirrrself'had approached thc learned trial Court by filing petition invoking the provisions of Section 70(2) of the Cr.P.C seeking recall ol'the NBW. When the said petition rs pending. the petitioner is not entitled to seek recall of the NBW by invoking the jurisdiction of'this Court under Section 528 of the BNSS

6. Ilaving considcred the submissions rnade by the rcspective partics anJ alicr perusal ol thc material on record. it reveals that the learned trial Court, on I 1.08.2025, issued NBW against the petitioner Thereafter. the petitioner filed a petition on 30.06.2026 in M.P.No.323 of 2026. seeking recall of the NBW issued against him by invoking the provisions of Section 70(2) ol the Cr.P.C. fhe learned counsel submits that the said application is still pending

7. 'lakrrr-s into consideration the peculiar lacts and circuntstances -- J made by the respective parties or on the petition filed by the petitioner in M.P.No.i23 o12026. the lcamed trial C'ourt is directed to dispose ol M.P.No.323 ol 2026 as expeditiously AS possible, preferably within a period of two (02) weeks from the date of receipt ol a copy of this order.

8. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is disposed of, Pending miscellaneous applications, if any. shall stand closed. SD/- L. USHA RANI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY' ,/'e- SECTION OFFICER To, '1 . The Judge, Principal Family Court, Secunderabad

2. One CC to Sri tr4ekala Sai Kalyan Goud, Advocate tOPUCI

3. TwoCCstothePublicProsecutor,HighCourtforthestateofTelangana,at Hyderabad (OUT)

4. Two CD CoPies DUGNK TT

HIGH COURT DATED: 0811012026

ORDER

CRLP.No.16660 ot 2026 ,J 16 (lt;'i '115 :1- -'l{ra c 1< :: I lrl tt

* r- .+; rEi DISPOSING OF THE CRIMINAL PETITION f? r5 ')ro lrs

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead