WP/34045/2026 of Arella Kalyani, Vs The State of Telangana on 8 October 2026

134741

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

THURSDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF OCTOBER

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY

AND

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA

WRIT PETITION NO: 34045 OF 2026

Between:

Arella Kalyani, D/o, Vijay Kumar, Aged about 20 years, Occ. Student, R/o,

H. No.1-4-116,Geetha Nagar, Back Side of Sub Jail, Jangaon Mandal, Warangal-

506167.TG.

...PETITIONER

AND

1. The State of Telangana, represented by its Principal Secretary, Medical and Health Family llfis Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad

2. Kaloji Nararayana Rao University of Health Sciences, represented by its Registrar, Warangal.

...RESPONDENTS

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents particularly the 2nd respondent in not considering the petitioner for counseling and admission into MBBS/BDS course under Management Quota C NRI Quota seat in ongoing phase or next phase of counselling for the academic year 2026-27 as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondents to consider and include the name of the petitioner for admission Into MBBS/BDS course under Management Quota C NRI Quota Seat for the academic yeat 2026-27 .

l.A. NO: 'l oF 2026

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in lhe affldavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the 2nd respondents to permit the petitioner to upload the NRI Documents for admission into MBBS/BDS Course under Management Quota"C" NRI Quota for admission into MBBS/BDS course for the academic year 2026-27 in ongoing phase or next phase of counseling, pending disposal of writ petition.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI ABDUL KABEER

Counsel forthe Respondent No.l : GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FW

Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SRI T.SHARATH, SC FOR KNRUHS

The Court made the following: ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

THE HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHTEF JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY

AND

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA

WP.No.34O45 of 2026

R No, HBH

Date:O8.1O.2O26

Between:

Arella Kalyani

And

...Petitioner

The State of Telangana & another.-

... Respondents

ORDER: (per the Hon'bte the Acting Chief lustice P.SAM KOSHY)

Mr. Abdul Kabeer, learned counsel appears for petitioner. Mr, R, NagarJuna Reddg, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Medical, Health and Family Welfare Department appears for respondent No. l. Mr, T. Sharath, learned Standing Counsel for Kaloj i Narayana Rao University of Hea-1th Sciences appears for respondent No.2.

2.

This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief:

''lo issue an appropriate writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature ofwrit of mandamus declaring the --

action of the respondents particularly the 2nd respondent in not considering the pelitioner for counseling and admission into MBBS/BDS course under Management Quota 'C" NRI Quota seat in ongoing phase or next phase of counselling for the acatlemtc year 2026-27 as illegal, arbittary' unconstitutional and consequenlly direct the resporulenls to consider and inc'lude the name of the peritioner -t'or admission into MBBS/BDS ctturse under Management Quota " C'

academic war 2026-27 "

NRt Quota Seat for the

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has got registered for admission into MBBS/BDS

Coursefortheacademicyeat2026-2TunderManagement Quota "C" category but could not get NRI documents from his relativewhoisSponsoringhimunderNRlcategory.Upon receipt of NRI documents subsequent to the release of final merit list, the petitioner approached the respondent University to upload such documents which were refused by the respondent University' He submits that the petitioner preferred a representation through email to the respondent University on 05.10.2026 to permit him to upload such NRI

documents, but the same has not yet been considered He further submits that the respondent University be directed to decide the said representation in a time bound manner'

@Erl![E[tt

4.

Learned Standing Counsel for the respondent Universit5z submits that the petitioner's representation shall be dealt with by the respondent University in accordaace with law.

5.

Accordingly, the instant Writ Petition is disposed of directing the respondent University to decide the petitioner's representation dated 05.\0.2026 as per the grounds taken in it, in accordance with law, by passing a reasoned order before the next counselling. It is made clea-r that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case. There shall be no order as to costs.

Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed SD/. P. PRAMOD NAIK

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

//TRUE COPY//

To

SECTION OFFICER

The Principal Secretary, Medical and Health Family llfis Department' Secretariat +ll'+';llll",l3i"il-lllllr:j.'. F#iLi*|.1,1911',"arth sciences', waransar .ii'. i"ii-":sri' nedul KASEER, Advocate toPUCl . . .

rwo ccs to GP FoR MED;;A'LT;II?;'& FW' Hish court for the state of

i.t"no"nr, at HYderabad [otJT'l

;;: tt i;;iitsHnnnri, scFoR KNRUHS [oPUc]

Two CD CoPies q

PSK.

PSK.

HIGH COURT

DATED: 0811012026