Telangana High Court

CRLP/15134/2026 of Shail Arshia @ Alekhya Vs The State of telangana on 7 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HON'BLE JUSTICE B.R.MADHUSUDHAN RAO CRIMINAL PETITION No. 15134 of 2026 (C.N.R No. HBHC010637032026) DATED: 07.10.2026 Between: Shaik Arshia @ Alekhya D/o Moulana … Petitioner – A6 And The State of Telangana, Rep. by Public

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT

HYDERABAD

THE HON'BLE JUSTICE B.R.MADHUSUDHAN RAO

CRIMINAL PETITION No. 15134 of 2026

(C.N.R No. HBHC010637032026)

DATED: 07.10.2026

Between:

Shaik Arshia @ Alekhya

D/o Moulana

…

Petitioner – A6

And

The State of Telangana,

Rep. by Public Prosecutor,

High Court for the State of Telangana

Hyderabad.

…

Respondent-State

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R

1. This Criminal Petition is filed under Sections 480 and 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) praying this Court to enlarge the petitioner- A6 on bail in connection with Crime No.1176 of 2026 of Madhapur Police Station, Cyberabad Commissionerate. The offences alleged against the petitioner-A6 are punishable under Sections 143, 144 of the BNS and Sections 3, 4 and 5 of the PIT Act.

2. Heard Sri K.Sai Babu, learned counsel for the petitioner – A6 and Sri D. Arun Kumar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, appearing for respondent - State.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegations made against the petitioner – A6 are false, fabricated

BRMR,J crlp_15134 _2026

and created for the purpose of the case and there is no truth in the case. Petitioner – A6 is married on 15.09.2024 and leading a happy marital life with her husband. She is a resident of Cuddapah, Andhra Pradesh and she was bought by other accused to Hyderabad for a job. A2 and A3 were enlarged on bail by the learned District Judge vide order, dated 28.09.2026 in Crl.M.P.No.627 of 2026, entire investigation is completed and prayed to enlarge the petitioner – A6 on bail.

4. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that the learned District Judge vide order, dated 28.09.2026 in Crl.M.P.No.627 of 2026 has enlarged A2 and A3 on bail and notice under Section 35 (3) of the BNSS was issued to A5 and A7. The role played by the petitioner-A6 is clearly depicted in the remand case diary.

5. Sri Naresh Kumar, Sub-Inspector of Police has lodged a report before P.S. Madhapur on 05.08.2026. It is stated in the report that on credible information and after obtaining permission from the higher authorities he conducted raid at Flat No.801, Sri Bhagyalakshmi MBS Apartment, Chanda Naik Thanda, Madhapur at about 19:00 hours, seven persons were organizing brothel house and one customer along with a woman sex worker were found in the premises. Basing on the said complaint, FIR came to be registered.

BRMR,J crlp_15134 _2026

6. Petitioner – A6 along with A1 to A4 were arrested on 05.08.2026 and were produced before the concerned Magistrate for remand on 06.08.2026, since then they are in jail.

7. Accused Nos.2 and 3 have filed Crl.M.P.No.627 of 2026 before the learned District Judge for grant of regular bail, the same came to be allowed vide order dated 28.09.2026 and they were enlarged on bail.

8. Since A1 and A4 are also enlarged on bail by the learned Sessions Judge, it appears from the record that major portion of the investigation is completed, detaining the petitioner – A6 further in judicial custody will not serve the purpose. Therefore, the petitioner – A6 is entitled to be enlarged on bail subject to following conditions:

i) The petitioner-A6 shall execute a personal bond for a sum of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only) with two sureties for a like sum each to the satisfaction of II Additional Junior Civil Judge-cum-X Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Ranga Reddy District at Kukatpally, Cyberabad.

ii) The petitioner-A6 shall appear before the concerned SHO between 10:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., on every Sunday for a period of eight (8) weeks or till filing of charge sheet whichever is earlier, for the purpose of investigation and thereafter, as and when required.

BRMR,J crlp_15134 _2026

iii) The petitioner – A6 shall not involve in similar offence.

iv) The petitioner-A6 shall abide by the conditions stipulated in Section 437(3) of Cr.P.C. (presently, Section 480(3) of the BNSS).

v) The petitioner-A6 shall not directly or indirectly influence, threaten, or induce any of the prosecution witnesses.

vi) In the event of violation of any of the above conditions, the prosecution is at liberty to file an application for cancellation of bail.

9. Accordingly, this Criminal Petition is allowed.

Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed.

______________________________

B.R.MADHUSUDHAN RAO, J Date: 07.10.2026. YVL

BRMR,J crlp_15134 _2026

THE HON'BLE JUSTICE B.R.MADHUSUDHAN RAO

CRIMINAL PETITION No. 15134 of 2026

(C.N.R No. HBHC010637032026)

Date: 07.10.2026

YVL

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead