Telangana High Court

CRLP/16070/2026 of Jarugu Raj Kumar Vs The State of Telangana on 7 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.R.MADHUSUDHAN RAO CRIMINAL PETITION No.16070 of 2026 CNR.No. HBHC010675762026 DATE: 07.10.2026 BETWEEN: Jarugu Raj Kumar … Petitioner – A1 And The State of Telangana Represented by its Public Prosecutor,

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.R.MADHUSUDHAN RAO

CRIMINAL PETITION No.16070 of 2026

CNR.No. HBHC010675762026

DATE: 07.10.2026

BETWEEN:

Jarugu Raj Kumar

… Petitioner – A1

And

The State of Telangana

Represented by its Public Prosecutor,

High Court of Telangana at Hyderabad

… Respondent - Complainant

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

1. This memorandum of Criminal Petition is filed under Sections 480 and 483 r/w Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) praying this Court to enlarge the petitioner - A1 on bail in S.C.No.685 of 2024 on the file of the XI Additional District and Sessions Judge, Ranga Reddy District, L.B.Nagar, which arose out of Crime No.1374 of 2023 of L.B.Nagar Police Station, Ranga Reddy District. The offences alleged against the petitioner – A1 are under Sections 302, 506 r/w Section 120(b) r/w 34 of IPC.

2. Heard Sri Sanjeeva Reddy Garlapati, learned counsel for the petitioner - A1 and Sri D.Arun Kumar learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent – State.

BRMR,J Crl.P.No.16070 of 2026

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner – A1 was enlarged on bail by this Court vide Crl.P.No.9409 of 2026 on 02.07.2026 on conditions. Condition No.ii is that ‘After release, the petitioner – accused No.1 shall appear before the learned Trial Court on each and every date of hearing till conclusion of trial.’ Petitioner – A1 has complied the conditions imposed by this Court in the order dated 02.07.2026. On 15.09.2026 petitioner-A1 has gone to Vijayawada and he instructed his Trial Court advocate to file an application under Section 317 of Cr.P.C to dispense with his personal appearance. But the learned Trial Court has dismissed the said application on the above said date and issued NBW against the petitioner – A1 and also issued summons to LW16, LW19 to LW21 and listed the Sessions Case on 23.09.2026. The petitioner – A1 has filed Criminal M.P.No.209 of 2026 on 16.09.2026 to recall NBW which also came to be dismissed on the same day with an observation that petitioner - A1 failed to comply the bail condition order of this Court dated 02.07.2026, was remanded to judicial custody and prayed to enlarge the petitioner – A1 on bail.

4. Petitioner – A1 is facing charges for the offence under Sections 302, 506 r/w Section 120(B) r/w Section 34 of IPC in SC.No.685 of 2024. On 15.09.2026 PW9 is examined, Exs.P8 and

BRMR,J Crl.P.No.16070 of 2026

P9, MO4 and MO5 are marked and the learned Additional Public Prosecution has given up LW12. On the same day, learned Sessions Court has issued summons to LW16, LW19 to LW21 and listed the case on 23.09.2026.

5. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that left over witnesses to be examined in the Sessions Case are 8. Petitioner – A1 could not appear before the Sessions Court on 15.09.2026 on some exigency as he went to Vijayawada, his counsel on record before the learned Sessions Court has filed petition under Section 317 Cr.P.C to dispense with his personal appearance but the same came to be dismissed.

6. The material goes to show that petitioner – A1 has been appearing before the learned Sessions Court and complying the condition No.ii as per the order passed by this Court on 02.07.2026. On 15.09.2026 he could not make his appearance before the learned Sessions Court due to unavoidable circumstances. Petitioner – A1 was taken into custody on 16.09.2026 when his Section 317 Cr.P.C. application is dismissed since then he is in jail.

7. Petitioner-A1 has made out a case for grant of bail subject to the following conditions:

BRMR,J Crl.P.No.16070 of 2026

i. The petitioner – A1 shall execute a personal bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only), with two sureties for a like sum each to the satisfaction of the learned XI Additional District and Sessions Judge, Ranga Reddy District at L.B.Nagar. ii. Petitioner – A1 shall appear before the learned Sessions Court on each and every date of hearing till conclusion of the trial, in exigencies the counsel on record is permitted to file dispense petition, dispensing the presence of the petitioner – A1.

8. Accordingly, this Criminal Petition is allowed.

Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed.

__________________________ B.R.MADHUSUDHAN RAO, J Date: 07.10.2026 Dua

BRMR,J Crl.P.No.16070 of 2026

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.R.MADHUSUDHAN RAO

CRIMINAL PETITION No.16070 of 2026

DATE: 07.10.2026 Dua

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead