Telangana High Court
WP/33016/2026 of B.V.R.Mohan Reddy Vs The State of Telangana, on 7 October 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.VIJAYSEN REDDY WRIT PETITION NO: 33016 OF 2026 Between: 1. B.V.R,Mohan Reddy, S/o late Sri B.Nagi Reddy,
[ 3183 I
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.VIJAYSEN REDDY
WRIT PETITION NO: 33016 OF 2026
Between:
1. B.V.R,Mohan Reddy, S/o late Sri B.Nagi Reddy, aged about 75 years' Rl/o Plot No. 1020, Road No.46, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad.
2. Smt.B.Sucharitha, W/o Sri BVR Molhan Reddy, aged about 73 years'
Housewife, Rl/o Plot No. 1020, Road No.46, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad'
Represented by their GPA holder G.Nageswar Reddy, S/o G' Ramchandra Reddy aged about 62 years, Occ Business, R/o. Plot No 40, Bhaskar Rao Nagar Colony, Sainikpuri, Secunderabad - 500094.
...PETITIONERS
AND
1. The State of Telangana, Rep. by Principal Secretary to Government'
Municipal Administration and Urban Development Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad.
2. Malkajgiri Municipal Corporation, Rep by its Commissioner, HMDA Building, Tarnaka, Hyderabad
3. Malkajgiri Municipal corporation, Rep by its Deputy Commissioner, circle -06, Ghatkesar Uppal Zone, Rangareddy District.
4. Pasula Venkateswar Reddy, S/o.P.Gopal Reddy, Aged 45 years, Occ upation Business, Fi./o.H. No. 1-1-104t9, Plot No.6, Gowdapuri Colony, Kapra, Sainikpuri, Hyderabad.
5. Nandimalla Raghavendar Reddy, S/o. N. Srinivas Reddy, aged about 44
years, Occupation Business, Rl/o. H. No. 1-5/2, Kadukuntla, Mahbubnagar District
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of wRlT oF
MANDAMUS declaring the action of the official Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 in not implementing the speaking order dated 27th May 2026 in Lr. No.
MMC/G1/GHAT 1051264212026 and in not removing the unauthorised blue tin-sheet shed and other illegal constructions raised by the Respondent Nos. 4 and 5 on Survey No. 110/C of Rampally Village, Keesara Mandal, Medchal-Malkajgiri District, at the Main Road of Rampally, as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to the municipal laws and building regulations and violative of Articles 14,21 and 300-4 of the Constitution of lndia and consequently direct the Respondent Nos. 'l to 3 to immediately implement the said speaking order, to cause removal of the unauthorised shed and all connected illegal constructions, to restrain the Respondent Nos. 4 and 5 from raising any further construction on the said land.
I.A. NO: 1 OF 2026
Petition under Section '151 CPC praying. that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 to immediately implement the speaking order dated 27th l,Aay 2026 in Lr. No. IVMC/G1/GHATI15| 264212026, to cause removal of the unauthorised shed and all connected illegal constructions, to restrain the Respondent Nos. 4 and 5 from raising any further construction on the said land, pending disposal of the Writ Petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI N.L NARAYANA
Counsel for the Respondent No.1: cP FOR MCPL ADMN & URBAN DEV
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2&3: SRI SRINVASA RAO PACHWA, SC FOR MMC
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.4&5: - - - - The Court made the following: ORDER
-a---
IN THE HIGH COURT T'OR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
ATHYDERABAD
THE HONOT]RABLE SRI JUSTICE B. VTJAYSEN REDDY
WRIT PETITON No.33016 OF 2026
CNR No.HBH C01067 7 53202
DATE: 07-10-2026
Between:
Mr. B.V.R. Mohan Reddy and another
... Petitioners
AND
The State ofTelangana
Rep. by its Principal Secretary,
Municipal Administration and Urban Development Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and others
... Respondents
ORDER: (ORAL)
Heard Mr. N. Lakshmi Narayana, leamed counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Srinivas Rao Pachwa, leamed standing counsel for Malkajgiri Municipal Corporation (MMC) appearing for respondent Nos.2 and 3.
2.
Leamed standing counsel for MMC submitted that speaking order dated 27.05.2026 will be implemented and unauthorized shed made by respondent Nos.4 and 5 in Sy.No.l10/C situated at Main Road, Rampally Village, Circ,le-06, Ghatkesar, lJppal Zote, -
Malkajgiri Municipal Corporation, will be removed, if so far not removed.
3.
Recording the aforesaid submission of leamed standing counsel for MMC, without going into the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of, directing respondent No.3 to forthwith implement the speaking order vide Lr.No.MMC/GllGHATlO5l 264212026 dated 27.05.2026, by affording opportuniry of hearing to all parties, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period ofthree (3) weeks from the date ofreceipt ofa copy ofthis order.
4.
As this order is passed without entering into the merits, notice to respondent Nos.4 and 5 is dispensed with. If respondent Nos.4 and 5 are in any way aggrieved by this order, they are at liberty to approach this Court seeking modification of this order.
No order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous applications, if any, pending in the writ petition stand closed.
SD/. A.H.S.GOWRI SHANKAR
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
1. The Principal Secretary to Government, Municipal Administration and Urban Development Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad.
To,
-
o
The Commissioner, IVlalkajgiri Municipal Corporation, HMDA Building, Tarnaka, Hyderabad The Deputy Commissioner, Malkajgiri Municipal Corporation, Circle _06, Ghatkesar Uppal Zone, Rangareddy District.
One CC to SRI N.L NARAYANA, Advocate tOpUCl One CC to SRI SRTNVASA RAO PACHWA, SC FOR MMC IOPUC]
Two CCs to GP FOR MCPL ADMN & URBAN DEV, High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad [OUT]
Two CD Copies
&'
PMK
TKS
HIGH COURT
DATED: 0711012026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
WP.No.33016 of 2026 CC TODAY A o T I <.
{)o g s rut s$ !) i1 -K i) ODISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS @n \ (